JP - Indeed, this wasn't the AI's fault, because it's only as good as it's programmers. Aside from that, experts have known for quite some time, that targeting the spike in a Cov was a fools errand, and could never end well as the risk far outweighed the benefit. So what was the true objective, of which the AI was NEVER given full knowledge?
This is why I call the FCS the biggest bait in molecular biology, someone wrote a poorly thought out algo, and the parameters for immunogenicity were so skewed to one side, it picked ALL the pathogenic parts as "best targets", at least from my perspective, no matter where I look at.
A crude, not that sophisticated algo in my view. It is just hubris provenient from DARPA.
I concur, but more towards a bait n switch. Pun intended. There is a union in "Where I look" and what they let us see. It is outside that union where one can find what they seek, fill in the blanks and connect the dots. At a minimum, this was NEVER about saving lives. Still leaves that dangling participle, the experts knew all along, and they have a true objective Mr. Mulder.
Its probably the same AI that is heavily left-biased and cant define what a woman is......and they let it design a jab for billions of people. Wouldnt surprise me. However, I get the feeling their motives were darker.
The bias comes after, AI is just pattern recognition+contextualization machine in a simplistic way, the bias is insert by humans (Reinforcement Learning is the name).
Each comapny has their own algos and AIs so you can't blame OpenAI for this (yet).
"Also to be abundantly clear, I will never touch an mRNA product in my lifestyle unless I or people I trust designed it from the ground up." Amen. And tested it thoroughly, too. As of now, the overall tech looks to be unsalvageable to me, partly because it looks like vaccination itself as a general method is inherently more costly than beneficial, and because the mRNA platform tech itself has too many failure modes.
But let me speculate here and do a little logical thinking and detective work. I think Pfizer's comments on their development tech are actually more than a little of a fake-out or smoke screen. I think the vaxxx was developed well before Pfizer's 2020 "4-month research" period, and the choice of the spike protein was deliberate, was made by humans prior to 2020, and was not as a result of the supposed Pfizer "AI tech" which is merely the "clothing" they are using to hide the true history. How coincidental is it that so many different manufacturers of the various vaccines ended up using different tech that so quickly came to the same conclusion from so many different angles? That alone means that Pfizer's "tech" is nothing unusual and did not endow Pfizer with any competitive advantage. The only conclusion I can come to is that the spike vaxxx existed before 2020 and was given to all the manufacturers in late 2019 or early 2020, and that each manufacturer then gaslighted us into thinking they each had special tech that made the fast development of their own C19 vaxxx product both possible and unerringly good. How could all of them miss the single most important fact in all of this, that the spike protein is one of the most toxic molecules ever invented by humans? Not one aspect of the story of valiant Pharma researchers and brilliant new tech combining to save the world makes any logical sense at all.
Since nobody will read this comment I will "spew" some of the beans that I got from converastions with different employees from both Moderna and Pfizer, some pretty high up the food chain.
Both companies got "fed" a information package on how to do every single step of the process, from a general idea on how to built its factories and scale up, to the precise processes to make mRNA and which antigen to use. This is why I left a hint on DARPA, while nobody actually knows, I am pretty certain ADEPT or similar algos/systems were the ones used to pick the Spike as a target, because any poorly designed algo to "predict" powerful antigenic/immunogenic sites would pick up the FCS, that things flares up like a Christimas tree on most of these programs is what I gathered from many accounts.
Apparently this "package gift" was in early 2020, very early on.
Never forget Moderna is literally a DoD company, DoD saved Moderna with a lot of investments and dictate the direction of the company by the looks of it. Still trying to figure out where Leidos come in, in all of this mess. Because they do have more than one finger in this mess in my opinion.
Wow, JP, thank you *so* much for this information. I consider it to confirm my above thoughts. Since few will see *my* comment here, either, I'll just say that I think the package you mention came from a place which has a name which begins with U and is much in the headlines these days.
I think so too, part of the work came from Baric lab, UNC, but I think DARPA didn't consult him (these people aren't that bright), similar how the dumb fucks responsible for that horrendous Origins paper wrote privately "don't see a necessity to talk to Baric".
Lmao, imagine think you are smarter or more competent than the guy who is the leading expert in coronavirus researcha and INVENTED a lot of tech used to study it.
It would be great fun to have 10 or 20 years of Fort Detrick notebooks to peruse.
It has very much seemed that the chemistry, physiology, and pathology that has been "discovered" (openly published and not "withdrawn", "retracted", or "rejected for publication", all synonyms for "cancelled") over the past three years was previously known. Certainly the antiviral properties of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were known since the original SARS. The SARS-CoV-2 pathology does not appear accidental. Nor does the mRNA/LPS system appear unintentionally hazardous.
I have just finished reading Dr. Kory's "The War on Ivermectin" which nicely extends RF Kennedy Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci" from last year.
These folks provided a nice 'booklet' to describe alot of info. I watched a video last night and I'm going to relisten. I was intrigued by Dr Palmer's comments (7:57) about how long it took to make it. What do you think?
Hi, Jana! Thanks for the links. Nah, not 2 seconds. Many years. They had to make the de novo virus spike (which is bad enough in more than a dozen different ways), run it through various animals to make it look like the virus hadn't been tampered with, and then they had to figure out what would happen when they put in pseudo-uridine and made other tweaks that made the vaxxx spike even worse and much less visible to the immune system. Lots of bio-lab work went into it (not just in Wuhan, btw). Lots of people involved in the US (the leaders), I think someone in Canada, folks in other countries. The rest of the video was really good, though. Very interesting to hear that the mRNA platform itself will always cause massive damage and to learn why. I've always felt that platform is fundamentally flawed but did not really know why. Palmer pretty much showed why. I've heard lots of positive comments about "Turtles All The Way Down" about vaccines in general. I haven't allowed myself to be vaccinated since the 1970s because I knew the whole vaccine paradigm is fatally flawed.
I appreciate your detailed exposition. I'm so skeptical I am skeptical of myself! The quality of this substack (which I constantly gush over) AND the readers comments has helped me immensely. I still verify stuff but I'm pretty convinced it's a weapon. The scale and proportion is beyond my imagination but it appears to be a most magnificent weapon. The added 'spice' of tyranny makes it surreal!
We humans are determined to cull the herd. Bizarre creatures we are!
Well, I would question your thought that "we" are determined to cull the herd as in "we humans". I'm thinking that those who are actually doing that culling, at the top anyway, may not actually be human in the sense we think of as human. It's a tiny minority of well-placed psychopaths, as far as I can tell, and in my most lurid imaginings, I consider the possibility that some of them are literally not human.
Im very open to the idea that there is djinn possessing these psychopaths.
One factor that Kevin McCairn says is that it may not be a killing bioweapon but an 'incapacitation agent'. My friends look at me like im crazy if I say bioweapon cos it insinuates we should all be dropping dead like flies but not if its a long game, a slow incapacitation and increase in dementia and cancer etc over years.
But that brings up the question, its still hardly a large cull, merely a few million out of 9 billion and growing. Why would they bother to cull a few only? And if HIV was similar as it appears to be also a bioweapon inserted in the hepta B vax, it culled only a few and then they waited decades to try again?doesnt make sense if they are evil psychopaths intent on mass culling.
And we shan't know their names let alone faces. The upper management level psychopaths that interface with the public eg Gates, Fauci, Soros, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Schwab, Epstein (RIP Lmfao), et al are just high - level fall guys. And even they are virtually untouchable. But, if things got hot enough, they'd be fed to the "mob" while holding the bag as a sacrificial concession. The herd is quite easy to appease.
Agree completely. I was using the royal 'we', a habit I formed when consulting. :) It softens the blow to the the listener to think that I relate to their stupid behavior.
I would personally try Berberine, Choline (as a supplement REGARDLESS of diet, even if the kid eats more eggs than I do). I don't like recommending aspirin for kids, maybe as a last resort.
Yes, I know exactly how you feel when you bring gut health and they don't understand. Gastrology is the reason I start "hating" doctors.
re Also to be abundantly clear, I will never touch an mRNA product in my lifestyle unless I or people I trusted designed it from the ground up. Tripping on the people I trusted...wouldn't you mean people I trust? Cuz there were so many I trusted...before.
Just marvelous. I’m not convinced that what you’re considering as poor algorithms wasn’t the intention all along. I expect LPSa will be added to everything we get. Can they get this stuff into pill form?
What blood tests can be done to show an lps antigen level that would suggest an endotoxin build up systemically?
My kids have had a million blood tests done now but when I read the results I can’t detect clearly evidence of a fungal issue.
I suspect some systemic infection of some sort is there which is causing immune system dysfunction (hyper reactive responses to seemingly mundane viruses or other)
But I can’t find the SOURCE.
er docs and specialists (immunologists and hematologists and allergists at a children’s hospital) have all drawn blood but every time they say it all comes back NORMAL. Yet I now have 2 kids who have immune systems that “freak out” over everything...
There must be a SOURCE.
So, how do I get the right blood work done to check for anti-lps to demonstrate that endotoxins are there and are the disruption?
That’s my theory. I’ve been down every rabbit hole with no solution yet.
Sorry taking longer to reply, lots going on. Microbiome/feces tests, testing in the blood is "somewhat" useless because there is too much going on in the blood and that mess with tests, and if there is testable levels in the blood that even the tests pick up, means there is endotoxemia (endotoxin in the blood at suffucient levels).
Microbiome and feces tests is the best starting point from my perspective, I don't recall the excat name, but it costs roughly 300 bucks and it very comprehensive. Measruing lymphocytes and T Helper cells COULD be of some help. Microbiome tests usually test for dysbiosis, if not, you may ask for it too.
I had a few people (adults, 40-50) that never found anything that I proposed until they found E. Coli (one of the worst strains) and Amoeba in the gut. There must be some imbalance in the gut IMO.
Have you tried giving Berberine to the kids that hyper react, for a few weeks, see how they respond ?
Ok so pfizer reached the end point by AI. So how did moderna, astrazeneca or sputnik reach exactly the same point in the same time? (and maybe some others also...)
Isn't the obvious reason everyone used S for their vaxxes simply because it is the entry protein and they were trying to elicit Abs to neutralize the virus?
That was the initial argument yes, but both CEOs (Pfizer and Moderna) said they used the Spike because it was the easiest target and because it was the target their algos picked based on how antigenic it was.
Remember, always remember Kariko said that "T cells are not that useful" 🤣
Excellent article, thanks
Pfizer is funding the Deliberate insertion of the Furin Cleavage Site now.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/directed-evolution-gain-of-function
Pfizer boasted that Endotoxin (LPS) Lipid A is their favourite Adjuvant in their Covid19 jab Patent
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/production-of-the-pfizer-biontech
Peter Hotez is behind US Military development of Superantigen Adjuvants based on modified Endotoxin
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/peter-hotez-promotes-endotoxin-and
I am pinning your comment because of its significance.
Whoever wrote their algos and trained their AI should be hanged.
JP - Indeed, this wasn't the AI's fault, because it's only as good as it's programmers. Aside from that, experts have known for quite some time, that targeting the spike in a Cov was a fools errand, and could never end well as the risk far outweighed the benefit. So what was the true objective, of which the AI was NEVER given full knowledge?
This is why I call the FCS the biggest bait in molecular biology, someone wrote a poorly thought out algo, and the parameters for immunogenicity were so skewed to one side, it picked ALL the pathogenic parts as "best targets", at least from my perspective, no matter where I look at.
A crude, not that sophisticated algo in my view. It is just hubris provenient from DARPA.
I concur, but more towards a bait n switch. Pun intended. There is a union in "Where I look" and what they let us see. It is outside that union where one can find what they seek, fill in the blanks and connect the dots. At a minimum, this was NEVER about saving lives. Still leaves that dangling participle, the experts knew all along, and they have a true objective Mr. Mulder.
Its probably the same AI that is heavily left-biased and cant define what a woman is......and they let it design a jab for billions of people. Wouldnt surprise me. However, I get the feeling their motives were darker.
The bias comes after, AI is just pattern recognition+contextualization machine in a simplistic way, the bias is insert by humans (Reinforcement Learning is the name).
Each comapny has their own algos and AIs so you can't blame OpenAI for this (yet).
I can’t see a link or screenshot to article for the Furin cleavage site GoF? Am I blinds or missing something?
See Reference 4 under Directed Evolution
"Also to be abundantly clear, I will never touch an mRNA product in my lifestyle unless I or people I trust designed it from the ground up." Amen. And tested it thoroughly, too. As of now, the overall tech looks to be unsalvageable to me, partly because it looks like vaccination itself as a general method is inherently more costly than beneficial, and because the mRNA platform tech itself has too many failure modes.
But let me speculate here and do a little logical thinking and detective work. I think Pfizer's comments on their development tech are actually more than a little of a fake-out or smoke screen. I think the vaxxx was developed well before Pfizer's 2020 "4-month research" period, and the choice of the spike protein was deliberate, was made by humans prior to 2020, and was not as a result of the supposed Pfizer "AI tech" which is merely the "clothing" they are using to hide the true history. How coincidental is it that so many different manufacturers of the various vaccines ended up using different tech that so quickly came to the same conclusion from so many different angles? That alone means that Pfizer's "tech" is nothing unusual and did not endow Pfizer with any competitive advantage. The only conclusion I can come to is that the spike vaxxx existed before 2020 and was given to all the manufacturers in late 2019 or early 2020, and that each manufacturer then gaslighted us into thinking they each had special tech that made the fast development of their own C19 vaxxx product both possible and unerringly good. How could all of them miss the single most important fact in all of this, that the spike protein is one of the most toxic molecules ever invented by humans? Not one aspect of the story of valiant Pharma researchers and brilliant new tech combining to save the world makes any logical sense at all.
Since nobody will read this comment I will "spew" some of the beans that I got from converastions with different employees from both Moderna and Pfizer, some pretty high up the food chain.
Both companies got "fed" a information package on how to do every single step of the process, from a general idea on how to built its factories and scale up, to the precise processes to make mRNA and which antigen to use. This is why I left a hint on DARPA, while nobody actually knows, I am pretty certain ADEPT or similar algos/systems were the ones used to pick the Spike as a target, because any poorly designed algo to "predict" powerful antigenic/immunogenic sites would pick up the FCS, that things flares up like a Christimas tree on most of these programs is what I gathered from many accounts.
Apparently this "package gift" was in early 2020, very early on.
Never forget Moderna is literally a DoD company, DoD saved Moderna with a lot of investments and dictate the direction of the company by the looks of it. Still trying to figure out where Leidos come in, in all of this mess. Because they do have more than one finger in this mess in my opinion.
Wow, JP, thank you *so* much for this information. I consider it to confirm my above thoughts. Since few will see *my* comment here, either, I'll just say that I think the package you mention came from a place which has a name which begins with U and is much in the headlines these days.
I think so too, part of the work came from Baric lab, UNC, but I think DARPA didn't consult him (these people aren't that bright), similar how the dumb fucks responsible for that horrendous Origins paper wrote privately "don't see a necessity to talk to Baric".
Lmao, imagine think you are smarter or more competent than the guy who is the leading expert in coronavirus researcha and INVENTED a lot of tech used to study it.
Reading that was remarkable.
American exceptionalism otherwise known as hubris.
It would be great fun to have 10 or 20 years of Fort Detrick notebooks to peruse.
It has very much seemed that the chemistry, physiology, and pathology that has been "discovered" (openly published and not "withdrawn", "retracted", or "rejected for publication", all synonyms for "cancelled") over the past three years was previously known. Certainly the antiviral properties of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were known since the original SARS. The SARS-CoV-2 pathology does not appear accidental. Nor does the mRNA/LPS system appear unintentionally hazardous.
I have just finished reading Dr. Kory's "The War on Ivermectin" which nicely extends RF Kennedy Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci" from last year.
These folks provided a nice 'booklet' to describe alot of info. I watched a video last night and I'm going to relisten. I was intrigued by Dr Palmer's comments (7:57) about how long it took to make it. What do you think?
https://odysee.com/@FrontlineCovid19CriticalCareAlliance:c/Weekly_Webinar_Aug23_2023:c?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=4efb61a9-3c63-4fba-8e52-85171259b53c
https://doctors4covidethics.org/mrna-vaccine-toxicity/
Hi, Jana! Thanks for the links. Nah, not 2 seconds. Many years. They had to make the de novo virus spike (which is bad enough in more than a dozen different ways), run it through various animals to make it look like the virus hadn't been tampered with, and then they had to figure out what would happen when they put in pseudo-uridine and made other tweaks that made the vaxxx spike even worse and much less visible to the immune system. Lots of bio-lab work went into it (not just in Wuhan, btw). Lots of people involved in the US (the leaders), I think someone in Canada, folks in other countries. The rest of the video was really good, though. Very interesting to hear that the mRNA platform itself will always cause massive damage and to learn why. I've always felt that platform is fundamentally flawed but did not really know why. Palmer pretty much showed why. I've heard lots of positive comments about "Turtles All The Way Down" about vaccines in general. I haven't allowed myself to be vaccinated since the 1970s because I knew the whole vaccine paradigm is fatally flawed.
I appreciate your detailed exposition. I'm so skeptical I am skeptical of myself! The quality of this substack (which I constantly gush over) AND the readers comments has helped me immensely. I still verify stuff but I'm pretty convinced it's a weapon. The scale and proportion is beyond my imagination but it appears to be a most magnificent weapon. The added 'spice' of tyranny makes it surreal!
We humans are determined to cull the herd. Bizarre creatures we are!
Well, I would question your thought that "we" are determined to cull the herd as in "we humans". I'm thinking that those who are actually doing that culling, at the top anyway, may not actually be human in the sense we think of as human. It's a tiny minority of well-placed psychopaths, as far as I can tell, and in my most lurid imaginings, I consider the possibility that some of them are literally not human.
Im very open to the idea that there is djinn possessing these psychopaths.
One factor that Kevin McCairn says is that it may not be a killing bioweapon but an 'incapacitation agent'. My friends look at me like im crazy if I say bioweapon cos it insinuates we should all be dropping dead like flies but not if its a long game, a slow incapacitation and increase in dementia and cancer etc over years.
But that brings up the question, its still hardly a large cull, merely a few million out of 9 billion and growing. Why would they bother to cull a few only? And if HIV was similar as it appears to be also a bioweapon inserted in the hepta B vax, it culled only a few and then they waited decades to try again?doesnt make sense if they are evil psychopaths intent on mass culling.
And we shan't know their names let alone faces. The upper management level psychopaths that interface with the public eg Gates, Fauci, Soros, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Schwab, Epstein (RIP Lmfao), et al are just high - level fall guys. And even they are virtually untouchable. But, if things got hot enough, they'd be fed to the "mob" while holding the bag as a sacrificial concession. The herd is quite easy to appease.
We are being farmed, no different than livestock.
These are the Farmers of Man.
Agree completely. I was using the royal 'we', a habit I formed when consulting. :) It softens the blow to the the listener to think that I relate to their stupid behavior.
Most certainly a bioweapon. DEATHVAX
juicy. every once in a while you or someone brings attention to some part that the most of us just had not realized or were aware of.
No Berberine will try. Will also get fecal testing done.
It’s almost like no one believe in gut health!!!
They look at you like you’re crazy!!
I would personally try Berberine, Choline (as a supplement REGARDLESS of diet, even if the kid eats more eggs than I do). I don't like recommending aspirin for kids, maybe as a last resort.
Yes, I know exactly how you feel when you bring gut health and they don't understand. Gastrology is the reason I start "hating" doctors.
re Also to be abundantly clear, I will never touch an mRNA product in my lifestyle unless I or people I trusted designed it from the ground up. Tripping on the people I trusted...wouldn't you mean people I trust? Cuz there were so many I trusted...before.
People I trust.
Just marvelous. I’m not convinced that what you’re considering as poor algorithms wasn’t the intention all along. I expect LPSa will be added to everything we get. Can they get this stuff into pill form?
What blood tests can be done to show an lps antigen level that would suggest an endotoxin build up systemically?
My kids have had a million blood tests done now but when I read the results I can’t detect clearly evidence of a fungal issue.
I suspect some systemic infection of some sort is there which is causing immune system dysfunction (hyper reactive responses to seemingly mundane viruses or other)
But I can’t find the SOURCE.
er docs and specialists (immunologists and hematologists and allergists at a children’s hospital) have all drawn blood but every time they say it all comes back NORMAL. Yet I now have 2 kids who have immune systems that “freak out” over everything...
There must be a SOURCE.
So, how do I get the right blood work done to check for anti-lps to demonstrate that endotoxins are there and are the disruption?
That’s my theory. I’ve been down every rabbit hole with no solution yet.
Sorry taking longer to reply, lots going on. Microbiome/feces tests, testing in the blood is "somewhat" useless because there is too much going on in the blood and that mess with tests, and if there is testable levels in the blood that even the tests pick up, means there is endotoxemia (endotoxin in the blood at suffucient levels).
Microbiome and feces tests is the best starting point from my perspective, I don't recall the excat name, but it costs roughly 300 bucks and it very comprehensive. Measruing lymphocytes and T Helper cells COULD be of some help. Microbiome tests usually test for dysbiosis, if not, you may ask for it too.
I had a few people (adults, 40-50) that never found anything that I proposed until they found E. Coli (one of the worst strains) and Amoeba in the gut. There must be some imbalance in the gut IMO.
Have you tried giving Berberine to the kids that hyper react, for a few weeks, see how they respond ?
You are a God send.
You are too kind.
Can you share some info on this Paxlovid all the docs are promoting?
The most pertinent/important one -> https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/paxlovid-use-becomes-dangerous-hcq
Other to consider reading -> https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/more-antigenic-sin-immune-shift-in
https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/paxlovid-resistance-emerges-
These are the ones "worth" reading.
Ok so pfizer reached the end point by AI. So how did moderna, astrazeneca or sputnik reach exactly the same point in the same time? (and maybe some others also...)
See my comment to another subscriber. Moderna and Pfizer got it from the DoD, AZ probably got from similar sources.
Sputnik there are many rumors surrounding it. They all used a similar algo. Which makes you think doesn't it ?
Isn't the obvious reason everyone used S for their vaxxes simply because it is the entry protein and they were trying to elicit Abs to neutralize the virus?
That was the initial argument yes, but both CEOs (Pfizer and Moderna) said they used the Spike because it was the easiest target and because it was the target their algos picked based on how antigenic it was.
Remember, always remember Kariko said that "T cells are not that useful" 🤣