and can change shape as it passes through the body
including through the blood-brain barrier.
Bag of tricks? I'm not surprised.
This was so close to being my livelihood, sequencing mRNA to try and solve the protein folding problem. So glad I made different choices and dropped out of the biocomputing masters program over a decade ago. What an absolute mess and the corruption to boot. The computer science field left out of public limelight. For reason. Each part doing their own part and pointing fingers in any which direction as long as it's not at self.
It is not just bioinformatics, or molecular biologists, or clinicians. Except people borderline crazy like I am, nobody is looking in the places they should, nobody is running the tests they should, and everybody is ignoring the non-canonical side of everything, with a few exceptions when they find “Novel” X or Y.
A few of the most important peptides sequences inside the Spike are completely ignored but by a few, and the few are ridiculed and sudden drop of the research map.
You go look what they have been researching and they quite literally dropped of the map. Changed fields sometimes.
There is a lot of pressure on people not researching the horrible impact the Spike Protein can have on the body besides the acceptable (coagulation, some autoimmunity, etc)
Ah dropped OFF the map. Yes I understand. I am following a few different researchers who haven't yet. It is not simple to me, but trying to grasp at some things here and there.
I’m sorry to hear about your family member. Thank you for the article it is well done.
I am distilling these past few articles into a talk for friends snd family. What do you think?
So. . . allowing yourself to be injected with spike protein facilitates the progress of clotting disease, lung disease, and neurological disease. As well, the likely human made construct which initially caused Co-Vid causes the same problems.
Bottomline: this situation was created in a lab. The solution causes more damage. Was it intentional, stupid, or both? We don’t know. But people can protect themselves by taking enteric nattokinase and/or NAC, as well as ivermectin.
Questions:
Is there a sense of recovery from an initial infection (no injections) Does the destructive cascade causing cellular damage stop? Does one need a daily dose of NAC as a prophylactic.
I don’t know the current thoughts on “shedding”. Seems to me NAC is important for that.
Somehow Substack hide your comment and I had to go back to my e-mail so I would be able to reply to you. I agree with your distilled version it is pretty much a good summary of what is going on.
I would also add Berberine too, NAC+Glycine (I will write a entire thing about this one) and Nattokinase/Serrapeptase, and VItamin D, these are the "bare minimum", IVM if they choose.
Yes there is a lot of recovery from the initial infection, the trick is actually recovering before your next infection. Most people (not injected) recover just fine, the supplements are to avoid the possibility of things going the wrong way the next infection and aiding recovery.
I do take NAC everyday, and NAC+Glycine have marvelous effects, especially for the jabbed, but if the person doesn't want to take it everyday as a prophylactic, they can just double/triple dose (1200-1800 mg) whenever the yet infected.
NAC is the most important one for me, it has been like that since 2020, and all the research done just solidified this for me.
I take NAC & glycine daily as well based on your previous recommendations. I will amend my summary. Thank you. I want to be concise for anyone who wants to know.
What is hidden in the SPIKE? Things Hidden in Complexity so exquisitely describes the novel discoveries of binding sites and their thus far hidden ramifications for us that you have uncovered.
You know, a quick "run down" on SARS-CoV-2 vs SARS-CoV (2003) and MERS-CoV (2012) might be illustrative, as far as these receptors are concerned and folks understanding of what is really going on.
It gets worse, thanks for highlighting p63 binding:
p63 and p73, the Ancestors of p53
...p73 and p63 are two homologs of the tumor suppressive transcription factor p53. Given the high degree of structural similarity shared by the p53 family members, p73 and p63 can bind and activate transcription from the majority of the p53-responsive promoters.
Btw, I got asked this in our trials group this week, Ivermectin can also inhibit aberrant leukemia cells via death by chloride ions, same mechanism as with prostate cancer and other cells 👍👍👍
The antiparasitic agent ivermectin induces chloride-dependent membrane hyperpolarization and cell death in leukemia cells (2010)
Thank you for the reference to AML and Ivermectin. Wisdom for all of us who are inculcated with the virtuosity of anti-parasite herbs, such as cloves, wormwood, and black walnut hull tincture. A hopeful old cell study!
hi Sally - we seem to swim in same waters ... looking forward to your newsletter ... may be you can focus on treatment??? translating the big discoveries and ideas for the layman ... just a thought ...
Errr.. We have been screwed. Both by China & the “science” who were too arrogant to come out & say we don’t understand this spike well enough. I’m positive China predicted that the west would underestimate their computer sequence virus sample that they handed over for us to inject. Also the new variants BQ etc apparently render the existing monoclonals including Evusheld almost useless.
China new the potential of the Spike since the get go, I have shared it here twice. They have been using a thymus seeking drug since the start. Russia also did, the West was just full of hubris in using the Spike because the work was basically done.
Yes, I have looked into the new variants, but I don't see a point in writing short posts of every new mutations, it would get bothersome, other papers and myself predict that monoclonals would become useless pretty soon, I said 2 variants from BA.5.
Interesting, great article. What about the conformation of the vaccine spike? Does it make any difference? I remember when they pointed to this as the reason it was safe. It's clear that was a wild guess and nothing more.
Also, I believe the indirect effect of ace2 is due to AT-1,7 reducing endothelial superoxide - is that right?
That is BS to full "the science", they have yet to send proof about the conformation of the Spike, and the Spike can cleavage itself via novel sites (I will cover in the protein mimicry piece).
Yes, the Spike can do that, but here we have proof it is a molecular signaling coagulopathy and not direct damage to the cells. Merely just binding creates the coagulation cascade.
An approximation
of only a part
which is unstable
creating something unnatural
and can change shape as it passes through the body
including through the blood-brain barrier.
Bag of tricks? I'm not surprised.
This was so close to being my livelihood, sequencing mRNA to try and solve the protein folding problem. So glad I made different choices and dropped out of the biocomputing masters program over a decade ago. What an absolute mess and the corruption to boot. The computer science field left out of public limelight. For reason. Each part doing their own part and pointing fingers in any which direction as long as it's not at self.
It is not just bioinformatics, or molecular biologists, or clinicians. Except people borderline crazy like I am, nobody is looking in the places they should, nobody is running the tests they should, and everybody is ignoring the non-canonical side of everything, with a few exceptions when they find “Novel” X or Y.
A few of the most important peptides sequences inside the Spike are completely ignored but by a few, and the few are ridiculed and sudden drop of the research map.
What does this mean "sudden drop of the research map"?
You go look what they have been researching and they quite literally dropped of the map. Changed fields sometimes.
There is a lot of pressure on people not researching the horrible impact the Spike Protein can have on the body besides the acceptable (coagulation, some autoimmunity, etc)
Ah dropped OFF the map. Yes I understand. I am following a few different researchers who haven't yet. It is not simple to me, but trying to grasp at some things here and there.
Here's one researcher: https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/optogenetics-the-archons-politics
Holy moly. The more you read, the more sinister it gets.
I'm not sure anymore that we can dismiss the theorie, that all of what we are seeing is part of the transhumanism brainfart of some evil f***s.
I'll keep tuned in
if Baric at al worked at it, you better believe SARS 2 can use all receptors known to man ... they got paid well, so better done a good job ...
I’m sorry to hear about your family member. Thank you for the article it is well done.
I am distilling these past few articles into a talk for friends snd family. What do you think?
So. . . allowing yourself to be injected with spike protein facilitates the progress of clotting disease, lung disease, and neurological disease. As well, the likely human made construct which initially caused Co-Vid causes the same problems.
Bottomline: this situation was created in a lab. The solution causes more damage. Was it intentional, stupid, or both? We don’t know. But people can protect themselves by taking enteric nattokinase and/or NAC, as well as ivermectin.
Questions:
Is there a sense of recovery from an initial infection (no injections) Does the destructive cascade causing cellular damage stop? Does one need a daily dose of NAC as a prophylactic.
I don’t know the current thoughts on “shedding”. Seems to me NAC is important for that.
Somehow Substack hide your comment and I had to go back to my e-mail so I would be able to reply to you. I agree with your distilled version it is pretty much a good summary of what is going on.
I would also add Berberine too, NAC+Glycine (I will write a entire thing about this one) and Nattokinase/Serrapeptase, and VItamin D, these are the "bare minimum", IVM if they choose.
Yes there is a lot of recovery from the initial infection, the trick is actually recovering before your next infection. Most people (not injected) recover just fine, the supplements are to avoid the possibility of things going the wrong way the next infection and aiding recovery.
I do take NAC everyday, and NAC+Glycine have marvelous effects, especially for the jabbed, but if the person doesn't want to take it everyday as a prophylactic, they can just double/triple dose (1200-1800 mg) whenever the yet infected.
NAC is the most important one for me, it has been like that since 2020, and all the research done just solidified this for me.
I take NAC & glycine daily as well based on your previous recommendations. I will amend my summary. Thank you. I want to be concise for anyone who wants to know.
Thank you!!
Another brilliant article!
What is hidden in the SPIKE? Things Hidden in Complexity so exquisitely describes the novel discoveries of binding sites and their thus far hidden ramifications for us that you have uncovered.
A reiterated huge thanks......
Also sorry to hear about your family member, I hope they are doing ok considering & thanks for taking the time to do such a great write up for us
This is an extremely satisfying article.
It is on the simple side, direct to the point. The next one I can't promise... lol.
Can't wait, good buddy.
You know, a quick "run down" on SARS-CoV-2 vs SARS-CoV (2003) and MERS-CoV (2012) might be illustrative, as far as these receptors are concerned and folks understanding of what is really going on.
The rundown is simple. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV were working in progress, the differences in receptor usage is what make this thing a marvel of science.
Do you have an indication of the timeline for the deaths which are coming and the consequent geopolitical ramifications?
It gets worse, thanks for highlighting p63 binding:
p63 and p73, the Ancestors of p53
...p73 and p63 are two homologs of the tumor suppressive transcription factor p53. Given the high degree of structural similarity shared by the p53 family members, p73 and p63 can bind and activate transcription from the majority of the p53-responsive promoters.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2926756/
Btw, I got asked this in our trials group this week, Ivermectin can also inhibit aberrant leukemia cells via death by chloride ions, same mechanism as with prostate cancer and other cells 👍👍👍
The antiparasitic agent ivermectin induces chloride-dependent membrane hyperpolarization and cell death in leukemia cells (2010)
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/116/18/3593/27970/The-antiparasitic-agent-ivermectin-induces
Thank you for the reference to AML and Ivermectin. Wisdom for all of us who are inculcated with the virtuosity of anti-parasite herbs, such as cloves, wormwood, and black walnut hull tincture. A hopeful old cell study!
hi Sally - we seem to swim in same waters ... looking forward to your newsletter ... may be you can focus on treatment??? translating the big discoveries and ideas for the layman ... just a thought ...
do you think they knew about all these pathways when designing this virus in the lab?
All, no, a lot of them most likely, or had a rough idea.
I understand from MedCram that NAC interferes with the formation of vWF.
Correct. Natto/lembro and serrapeptase also help a lot.
Errr.. We have been screwed. Both by China & the “science” who were too arrogant to come out & say we don’t understand this spike well enough. I’m positive China predicted that the west would underestimate their computer sequence virus sample that they handed over for us to inject. Also the new variants BQ etc apparently render the existing monoclonals including Evusheld almost useless.
China new the potential of the Spike since the get go, I have shared it here twice. They have been using a thymus seeking drug since the start. Russia also did, the West was just full of hubris in using the Spike because the work was basically done.
Yes, I have looked into the new variants, but I don't see a point in writing short posts of every new mutations, it would get bothersome, other papers and myself predict that monoclonals would become useless pretty soon, I said 2 variants from BA.5.
Interesting, great article. What about the conformation of the vaccine spike? Does it make any difference? I remember when they pointed to this as the reason it was safe. It's clear that was a wild guess and nothing more.
Also, I believe the indirect effect of ace2 is due to AT-1,7 reducing endothelial superoxide - is that right?
That is BS to full "the science", they have yet to send proof about the conformation of the Spike, and the Spike can cleavage itself via novel sites (I will cover in the protein mimicry piece).
Yes, the Spike can do that, but here we have proof it is a molecular signaling coagulopathy and not direct damage to the cells. Merely just binding creates the coagulation cascade.