Big pharma wont let the actuaries malign their reputation like that by banning the vaxxed or increasing their premiums as it would prove their product is garbage. It would have to be a govt mandate to have a UBI style everyone pays for insurance thing.
What does the 3-5 years of expected excess death come from? Is it based on people have already taking 2 shots, and perhaps a booster or 2, or is it based on the assumption of continued boosting?
4+ shots is what they are working with, plus the trends they are seeing and tracking (internally). There is a lot of data that life insurers and mortuaries are not publishing, keeping it tight for obvious reasons.
Do you have any articles regarding the life insurance rumours? I’ve heard it as well but not from any source I’ve considered reliable. The other thing I wonder though is how will their business be affected if they no longer write policies for 50-75% of the population? Or will they just change premium structure so having been jabbed is like being obese and a heavy smoker? (Or whatever the relative risk increase is?) whole lot of people would be upset to see premiums go up.
Cube Cubis already posted a link, but no, I don't, I don't even have tweets about it, just commentaries here and there. Apparently they will adjust premium structure, but some want to outright prohibit jabbed to sign new contracts, and null current ones.
Excess death for extended periods of time will have a disproportionate impact on them.
It's in the category of things I wonder about. It's a failing business model to exclude so many people - but worse yet would be to write policies and then have large payments you have to make. Here's to hoping the company I'm paying premiums to makes it through the coming mess.
Been thinking it’s time to figure out a fixed cost life insurance. Guarantee in the next year premium adjustments are going to get painful for a lot of people to accommodate this and they’ll figure out how to lessen coverage.
Here, starting around 08:10 Ed Dowd talks about 2022 inside whistleblower information on the insurance industry. The Society of Actuaries' numbers on the Millenial Group life insurance policy holders (age 25-34) , for the month of August saw a 36% excess mortality.
This is showing the continued destruction of the immune system.
It will be interesting to watch how long this trend continues in the jabbed population.
The thing that gets me on that table 4 chart is the -5% in infant mortality for 2020.
Really wish we could parse that out. Was that fewer babies getting routine vaccinations? Fewer babies getting hauled off to the pediatrician's office every few weeks? More babies staying at home instead of in daycare? Fewer viruses circulating among the babies' older siblings because they weren't in school? More successful breastfeeding because mom wasn't at work all day? All of the above? Something else?
All of the above, with a little touch of something else would be my honest opinion. With routine vaccinations at a early age playing a substantial role IMO.
I wish you and Brian Mowrey could get on the same page as far as OAS and "imprinting". This is a very difficult subject. I believe one confounding factor here is how the mRNA injections create a much higher fidelity, more focused "single" antigen swarm than would normal infection so that, even if previous concepts of OAS were faulty, there is potentially something completely new and different happening here that deserves a new name.
What is the switch or threshold that turns on IgG4? Why is it getting turned on after the booster, having never been noted before in the context of vaccination or natural infection? Imprinting/OAS and eventually type switching... these effects could be related across a continuum. What is the axis or axes though? How is this space defined?
Whatever name people want to give, it is happening. It has been my opinion that the shift towards IgG4 was because of the excessive inflammation produced by each jab and consequentially each new infection after new jab. Nobody knows the treshold, it is a "early field", IgG4 like Galectin-3 is... weird, and both "work together".
It has been seen in natural infection, very rarely, in people already sick, and there is a sudden shift after a rather moderate infection (with after-effects) and development of some "odd" disease.
Mary Pat Campbell has written some excellent articles analyzing the 2021 death trends. Depending on whether you accept the published data on face value, much of the excess death can be explained by non-vaxx factors. I am looking forward to analysis of the 2022 data, which seems to be exhibiting worse sustained excess deaths, more temporally removed from the 2020 NPIs.
I don't trust any data, from anyone given my background. But some people find it easier to understand things using graphs.
They will wash massive amounts of deaths by attributing to everything else because few in academic research are testing and looking into the pathways the mRNA induces disease
They're doing so now, playing games with the numbers and cause of death codes to hold off the truth as long as possible. Ethical Skeptic and Mathew Crawford have been examining this. It will get very ugly very soon. Too many deaths to misappropriate.
I agree with the sentiment. In the case of the younger age groups average annual deaths are low enough that moderate increases in deaths from suicide, overdose, and reckless behavior drive significant YoY percentage changes. The lockdowns are their own mass tragedy.
Edit: I just realized your linked article is authored by Mary Pat Campbell herself, d'oh...
Big pharma wont let the actuaries malign their reputation like that by banning the vaxxed or increasing their premiums as it would prove their product is garbage. It would have to be a govt mandate to have a UBI style everyone pays for insurance thing.
What does the 3-5 years of expected excess death come from? Is it based on people have already taking 2 shots, and perhaps a booster or 2, or is it based on the assumption of continued boosting?
4+ shots is what they are working with, plus the trends they are seeing and tracking (internally). There is a lot of data that life insurers and mortuaries are not publishing, keeping it tight for obvious reasons.
Do you have any articles regarding the life insurance rumours? I’ve heard it as well but not from any source I’ve considered reliable. The other thing I wonder though is how will their business be affected if they no longer write policies for 50-75% of the population? Or will they just change premium structure so having been jabbed is like being obese and a heavy smoker? (Or whatever the relative risk increase is?) whole lot of people would be upset to see premiums go up.
Cube Cubis already posted a link, but no, I don't, I don't even have tweets about it, just commentaries here and there. Apparently they will adjust premium structure, but some want to outright prohibit jabbed to sign new contracts, and null current ones.
Excess death for extended periods of time will have a disproportionate impact on them.
It's in the category of things I wonder about. It's a failing business model to exclude so many people - but worse yet would be to write policies and then have large payments you have to make. Here's to hoping the company I'm paying premiums to makes it through the coming mess.
I did a stack on this early inntheyear in Germany where the biggest insurer wont cover for accidents due to mass vaccination. I'll post
https://cubecubis.substack.com/p/whoops-of-the-week-177?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Been thinking it’s time to figure out a fixed cost life insurance. Guarantee in the next year premium adjustments are going to get painful for a lot of people to accommodate this and they’ll figure out how to lessen coverage.
yeah fun times ahead.
Here, starting around 08:10 Ed Dowd talks about 2022 inside whistleblower information on the insurance industry. The Society of Actuaries' numbers on the Millenial Group life insurance policy holders (age 25-34) , for the month of August saw a 36% excess mortality.
This is showing the continued destruction of the immune system.
It will be interesting to watch how long this trend continues in the jabbed population.
https://rumble.com/v1uxz8i-ed-dowd-and-mike-adams-deep-dive-into-excess-mortality-following-covid-vacc.html
The thing that gets me on that table 4 chart is the -5% in infant mortality for 2020.
Really wish we could parse that out. Was that fewer babies getting routine vaccinations? Fewer babies getting hauled off to the pediatrician's office every few weeks? More babies staying at home instead of in daycare? Fewer viruses circulating among the babies' older siblings because they weren't in school? More successful breastfeeding because mom wasn't at work all day? All of the above? Something else?
All of the above, with a little touch of something else would be my honest opinion. With routine vaccinations at a early age playing a substantial role IMO.
RFK Jr shows SIDS went down during that year, and speculates that the reason is the lack of regular childhood vaccines because of reduced peds visits.
I wish you and Brian Mowrey could get on the same page as far as OAS and "imprinting". This is a very difficult subject. I believe one confounding factor here is how the mRNA injections create a much higher fidelity, more focused "single" antigen swarm than would normal infection so that, even if previous concepts of OAS were faulty, there is potentially something completely new and different happening here that deserves a new name.
What is the switch or threshold that turns on IgG4? Why is it getting turned on after the booster, having never been noted before in the context of vaccination or natural infection? Imprinting/OAS and eventually type switching... these effects could be related across a continuum. What is the axis or axes though? How is this space defined?
https://unglossed.substack.com/p/updates-to-oas
"OAS is a myth."
Whatever name people want to give, it is happening. It has been my opinion that the shift towards IgG4 was because of the excessive inflammation produced by each jab and consequentially each new infection after new jab. Nobody knows the treshold, it is a "early field", IgG4 like Galectin-3 is... weird, and both "work together".
It has been seen in natural infection, very rarely, in people already sick, and there is a sudden shift after a rather moderate infection (with after-effects) and development of some "odd" disease.
Mary Pat Campbell has written some excellent articles analyzing the 2021 death trends. Depending on whether you accept the published data on face value, much of the excess death can be explained by non-vaxx factors. I am looking forward to analysis of the 2022 data, which seems to be exhibiting worse sustained excess deaths, more temporally removed from the 2020 NPIs.
I don't trust any data, from anyone given my background. But some people find it easier to understand things using graphs.
They will wash massive amounts of deaths by attributing to everything else because few in academic research are testing and looking into the pathways the mRNA induces disease
They're doing so now, playing games with the numbers and cause of death codes to hold off the truth as long as possible. Ethical Skeptic and Mathew Crawford have been examining this. It will get very ugly very soon. Too many deaths to misappropriate.
I agree with the sentiment. In the case of the younger age groups average annual deaths are low enough that moderate increases in deaths from suicide, overdose, and reckless behavior drive significant YoY percentage changes. The lockdowns are their own mass tragedy.
Edit: I just realized your linked article is authored by Mary Pat Campbell herself, d'oh...
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=956088&post_id=85425309&utm_source=post-email-title&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1Njk1MTA2MCwicG9zdF9pZCI6ODU0MjUzMDksImlhdCI6MTY2ODgwNzExMywiZXhwIjoxNjcxMzk5MTEzLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItOTU2MDg4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.vWCnDauFSNpdgP1-67ZUYBI5RS7CINpuiZP65eGSy98
Reutlingen pathologies, Dr David Nixon. La Quintal Column a and many others have found them.
What symptoms do you say aren't attributable to heavy metals?
What if the jabs only contained a variety of heavy metals
Wouldn't have all the effects we have observed for the last 18 months, especially under microscopes.