22 Comments
User's avatar
Just_Henry's avatar

Excellent work! Yes, we are in the middle of an ‘experiment in nature’ where we are the subjects (guinea pigs). It seems to me that the mechanisms you describe here could all fall under the heading of “Unintended Consequences of Unleashing Untested Vaccines.”

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Yes, some of the mechanisms described could fall under that, but the main one (the last paper about Covid, which I don't think people paid as much attention as they should, perhaps my fault) is in the virus.

Whoever designed this was a damn genius. Highway of pathogenic evolution now.

Expand full comment
Sally Gould's avatar

Thank you so much for compiling and sharing such fascinating information!!!

Just yesterday, I learned about common building blocks of SARS with other viruses on the absolutely wonderful mejbcart Substack cited below:

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/how-much-hiv-is-in-sars-cov-2-faucis

"....In order to propagate for example viral SARS-CoV-2 infection with a big pool of identical building blocks common with HIV-1, with Marburg, with all the other viruses mentioned in previous posts, incredible large portions of HUMAN proteins, any genetic re-programming of the human body for synthetic SARS Spikes production will automatically affect infections with other even more lethal or maybe even benign viruses."

On to bacteria....

And, now, I am so happy to be able to share your Substack research on bacteria with two io groups. 

Carlo Brogna and his team have another cool study. https://f1000research.com/articles/11-292

We know that the virus can enter bacteria and stick around for a long period.  Further, a most intriguing finding, Different lineages?  Hijacking of the cellular machinery of two different species? "Overall, this finding provides an indication that bacteria might be a potential source of novel SARS mutations, and gives rise to the possibility that intra-host SARS haploytpes might reflect different intestinal bacterial prior host environments of the virus.  This observation would represent the basis for one of the proposed origins of the Omicron variant i.e. that Omicron (and other variants) might have evolved in the gut bacteria of one person."

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

I think I wrote about that paper or mentioned it here somewhere and agreed at some levels with the researchers, but had some different opinions, in so far we lacked the proper mechanism to explain what we were seeing (both me and the researchers).

One of the papers in the biofilms post linked here argues with good sourcing on how that biofilms can be a coronavirus resevoirs, and a SARS-CoV-2 one, now more than likely, it is occuring in immuno compromised or dysfunctional people.

It is mathematically impossible for Omicron to have originated anywhere else but a lab, you take everything that makes the original Spike Protein and some other parts "bad", and literally reverse it to the opposite, even the immune response of the Omicron Spike in a lab is the opposite of Wuhan Spike. There is a good post that I lost on Twitter where a molecular biologist argued that Omicron is the most educated virus in the planet, because it has all the exact mutations published prior to its "origin", mutations that made variants till Delta rather virulent, and attenuated after.

In my opinion, Omicron origianted from another group, not completely involved with the first release.

Expand full comment
Geoffrey Newton's avatar

Wow! This is incredible research. Thank you for your diligence and thoroughness. I was always intrigued by the Pradhan paper on finding gp120 in Sars-Cov-2. Is it possible that SARS-2 can use gp120 as an envelope to gain entry to CD4 cells like HIV by creating HVP? It’s intriguing especially when you consider the Spike protein tests HIV positive. What does this all mean? We have opened Pandoras Box. God help us!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I am having similar thoughts. Some basic microbiology/genetics/virology has been ignored when creating this so called vaccine. There is no justification for this carelessness. If it was intentional; I don’t know what to say other that fame, greed, and arrogance have created a dreadful situation.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

That is an argument some "respect" scientists are starting to make, because the HIV inserts were blacklisted purely via political decisions and pressuring. Some argue it can, others argue it can't, but SARS-CoV-2 can infected CD4 anyway via other method, and cause their deaths (it can't create a resevoir in those cells, unlike HIV).

All these inserts can do though are remarkable, if you know where to look, I will try to publish my Galectin-3 piece tomorrow, and most people will understand.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Thanks for putting words and sense to the thoughts that have been roaming through my mind. Well done. It’s nice to know we aren’t just crazy people.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Isn't it ? One side of me finds it soothing that I am not completely insane, even though sometimes I propose things that defy "canonical" science, also initially I often lack the precise mechanims, so it is hard to make a proper proposal.

On the other side, if I was correct in so far to most of my observations, I become lightly depressed, because "what if I am correct in the others too".

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Agreed there is the other side (sighing sadly)

Expand full comment
Dr Jen | Syringa Wellness's avatar

if they were to do a proper biodistribution study of the transfection, it would seem prudent to also look at the microbiome, perhaps with stool and urine, in a way that captures all the stuff from something like a genova diagnostics ION or Metabolomix panel.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

If they looked into the microbiome, this product would have never been approved, because now I can guarantee you there would be a shift, if not outright bacterial translocation.

S1 bursts biofilms, S1+S2 become a LPS IID. Improvised Inflammatory Device.

Expand full comment
Just_Henry's avatar

I’d be curious on your take on this unique observation regarding fenbendazole and cancer. As the covid vax ramps up cancer incidence in its victims fenbendazole, as an ORC, safe and cheap cancer treatment is timely https://fenbendazole.substack.com/?r=oh1g6&utm_campaign=pub&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

I will keep an eye on that Substack, I have no opinions on fenbendazole right now, the problem is that the cancers are not coming from a single source, they have a single initial "impact" but the sources are multiple, unless fenbendazole directly acts in the thymus and bone marrow.

Expand full comment
Dr Jen | Syringa Wellness's avatar

a local acupuncturist has a once-a-month routine of taking FBZ.

my 5x-injected mother was recently diagnosed with stage 3B ovarian cancer and it is one of the things we're considering adding (but first, injectable mistletoe). (irony: her vax-pushing oncologist is now sidelined from practicing medicine because he had a massive stroke but he's in the usual stroke age window so i'm sure that injections won't factor into cause.)

Expand full comment
Beenz's avatar

OK, lets see if I understand your last few articles:

So, C19 virus can also interact or mess with bacteria? So, C19 is a bit like NATO, it interacts with western democracies but also brings along nazis for the ride. And the spike is like a tank, it pierces membranes and tramples everywhere and LPS endotoxin hitches along for the ride, after the tank breaks into a cell, out bursts all the LPS toxic soldiers with AK47's to cause havoc?

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

The Spike Protein is a battalion sized molecule, and embedded in that group there are covert, deniable special forces.

The tank can pierce membrane, or the Special forces units can just take the LPS and use as their own weapons systems.

The S1 part of the Spike also works as a bunker busters. Special forces finish the job

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

On further thought, using your military analogy, the Spike Protein is the NanoSuit from the game series Crysis. Quite literally.

Expand full comment
Owl-Eyed Apprentice's avatar

i've been trying to wrap my head around the significance of this, because this seems to have huge implications, if i'm understanding this right...

it is possible then that the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 can incorporate itself into other viruses?

if this is the case, would the spike protein inside a different virus go undetected during testing for SARS-CoV-2 exposure?

Expand full comment
Just_Henry's avatar

Great! It appears that fenbendazole exploits a common weakness (within the microtubule system) that most cancer cells share. This selective attack on the cancer cell is very targeted which is why fenbendazole is free of side effects.

Expand full comment
Beenz's avatar

Off topic slightly, but I read somewhere that a paper showed all the mice died after 9-15 exposures to spike. I was wondering if that sort of thing was true and I know mouse studies are good but I also know mice biology is different to human. Maybe if it takes 9 exposures to kill all the mice itll take 109 exposures to kill a human or1009.

So far I think Ive only been exposed once. In December 2019 I had a long flu for about 2 weeks and ever since I have constant green plegm in my throat, especially upon waking. It may have been flu and not covid.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

It is really hard to do that "math" when comparing mices to humans, a lot of other variables come to play, especially because many of these mice are genetically engineered, that alone will affect outcomes.

There is some arguments from a small group of scientsts that too many exposures will accelerate your biological age, I guess rampant viral replication, endless infections without proper care will take a good decade or two from said peoeple in the long run.

As long as you address the different types of damage (some level of endotelhial, all the inflammation and ROS, the mitochondrial fuckery) I think most of us will be fine.

Expand full comment