I started to read your stack and then opened and read your linked study which concluded:
The US government invested at least $31.9bn to develop, produce, and purchase mRNA covid-19 vaccines, including sizeable investments in the three decades before the pandemic through March 2022. These public investments translated into millions of lives saved and were crucial in developing the mRNA vaccine technology that also has the potential to tackle future pandemics and to treat diseases beyond covid-19.
The US government has invested billions of dollars throughout 3 decades to create the mRNA plataform.
mRNA isn't going anywhere was my point, not the fluff many authors insert on their papers (so they can get published, otherwise you WILL NOT get published). My brain just instantly ignores the fluff now, but I often forget others won't do this as second nature =P
Yes, just public avaliable grant data. It is just too time consuming and brain numbing to go through decades of grants linked to this, glad someone else did.
You can't openly criticize the mRNA plataform unless your work is both novel and iron-clad, and even at that point, it is risky sometimes. So they need to always insert the party line here and there. I can't in good conscience blame the researchers, at least we are getting data, I can make sense of it on my own, as long as the data comes.
So what are they going to blame this huge increase in excess deaths on? I assume although different outcomes if they use LNPs heart damage at least is unavoidable
Agree with your suggested path forward. Put up as big a tent as possible - and freedom of information with regard to all media is the biggest tent possible to let the truth emerge through open debate including extreme viewpoints. The topics of importance to various groups and individuals differ, but the distrust in both the government , the elites and the MSM is widespread .For some it has developed due to the widespread vaccine and Covid misinformation. For some it was the Russian collusion hoax. For some it has emerged from the trans propaganda. But in all cases people want to choose which information sources they come to trust. Everyone knows that such statements as “ just trust the science “ or “climate change is settled science” are inimical to the scientific method, and simply the elites attempting to tell the unwashed masses to trust their supposed more intelligent betters who don’t have to shop at Walmart .
If memory serves, a similar effort backfired amazingly on the government of California (AB 2098). Opponents to the bill merely showed video of its main proponents "spreading misinformation" before the "science changed". An injunction was quickly issued and it was quietly taken behind the barn and put down.
They always keep inserting little amendments underhandedly, which is my main concern, exactly how they did it here passing the law to obligate mothers to vaccinate their kids.
It gets to a point where people ignore or engage in fraud as a matter of basic necessity. I wonder if the ruling class ever realizes they're normalizing disregard of the law, and how that erodes their power.
"Dying societies accumulate laws like dying men accumulate remedies." -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
That is one of my favorite quotes and I had the thought that elites develop these self-destructive memes, that spreads throughout society and among themselves, leading to erosion of hierachy and power as a form of nature balacing itself.
The only explanation that makes some sense in my (weird) brain.
I see folks celebrating what they think are wins, and they are wins but little ones. In the meantime (IMHO) they miss the fact that overall little has changed in the big picture and we're still hurtling towards some end whose design goes back to the 50s, and that these people mean to see this through to their desired end. But hope remains...
I understand a lot of people want to follow general recommendations, almost everyone I know got willingly vaccinated (still can't believe it, but that's the world). Why can't they allow a few to make choices on their own?
I have a few opinions on why. As I wrote multiple times, the next pandemic will me massive so I think their models implicate they would be able to handle the next one by scaling mRNA globally.
I only trust myself and judge the information and evidence for myself. I do recommeded everyone do the same, but this is my full time job and people have their lives, so in that regard, do what I do often.
Professor - Notice how Art 4 was snuck in while the farmers protest? More to come on the Pfizer Guillotine. "almost all elites got vaccinated" Insiders and those intelligent enough, saline for filmed PSA and public vax appearances, otherwise, large Xmas envelope for Dr. who issued fake certs. Nobody with means and brains got the shot, ever. As you know, those two things are not mutually exclusive. And none of the elites subscribe to collectivist "its for the common good" idiocy. It's all about them and the rest of us be damned Mr. Mulder.
Pascal Najadi is a very interestingly constructed farce! None of the true Swiss opposition trust him at all. Look where did his legal action against the prime- and health minister (Alain Berset) go since 2022?? Did anything come out of that big fluffy fanfare??: zilch. Or using a popular term nowadays: "Zero Emission".
Off topic. But when you last came back on the bird app, I asked what your opinion was about a 9x jabbed 55 yo mother who seemed to be getting "better" from LC. So I learned more today.
1. Covid infection in March 2020 but she's unable to produce antibodies only "polyclonals"
2. CD4/CD8 ratio was only 12
3. Developed neutropenia
4. After 9 vaxxes she seems to have finally developed some "immunity". Worried about "overdoing" the jabs
5. Her last bloodwork shows everything as "normal"
Question: would it be because she wasn't developing antibodies the reason the jabs were not toxic to her? Just curious what your hypothesis would be. Tnx! Screenshot of her tweets mentioning "bloodwork" https://ibb.co/LJz5SyH
I am honest and sincere to my own detriment. So I rather write what I really think, rather than lie to you.
It may read little bit as a black pill, but it isn't.
I started to read your stack and then opened and read your linked study which concluded:
The US government invested at least $31.9bn to develop, produce, and purchase mRNA covid-19 vaccines, including sizeable investments in the three decades before the pandemic through March 2022. These public investments translated into millions of lives saved and were crucial in developing the mRNA vaccine technology that also has the potential to tackle future pandemics and to treat diseases beyond covid-19.
What did I miss??
The US government has invested billions of dollars throughout 3 decades to create the mRNA plataform.
mRNA isn't going anywhere was my point, not the fluff many authors insert on their papers (so they can get published, otherwise you WILL NOT get published). My brain just instantly ignores the fluff now, but I often forget others won't do this as second nature =P
I also expect studies to publish along party lines:(
Was there data in this study which proves your point?
Yes, just public avaliable grant data. It is just too time consuming and brain numbing to go through decades of grants linked to this, glad someone else did.
You can't openly criticize the mRNA plataform unless your work is both novel and iron-clad, and even at that point, it is risky sometimes. So they need to always insert the party line here and there. I can't in good conscience blame the researchers, at least we are getting data, I can make sense of it on my own, as long as the data comes.
So what are they going to blame this huge increase in excess deaths on? I assume although different outcomes if they use LNPs heart damage at least is unavoidable
All the infections you get AFTER getting the mRNA vaccine. They have been doing it since the start.
There are however many new formulations 🤔 perhaps they will bs and say it is safer now, the "trust me bro" strategy 😂.
the old whoops... we got that wrong. but now the science is actually settled.. you will be put in jail if you dont believe us
Tha jail part is kind of new. Polio vaccine disaster didn't require those methods, i suppose trust in the system and doctors was higher back then
Agree with your suggested path forward. Put up as big a tent as possible - and freedom of information with regard to all media is the biggest tent possible to let the truth emerge through open debate including extreme viewpoints. The topics of importance to various groups and individuals differ, but the distrust in both the government , the elites and the MSM is widespread .For some it has developed due to the widespread vaccine and Covid misinformation. For some it was the Russian collusion hoax. For some it has emerged from the trans propaganda. But in all cases people want to choose which information sources they come to trust. Everyone knows that such statements as “ just trust the science “ or “climate change is settled science” are inimical to the scientific method, and simply the elites attempting to tell the unwashed masses to trust their supposed more intelligent betters who don’t have to shop at Walmart .
If memory serves, a similar effort backfired amazingly on the government of California (AB 2098). Opponents to the bill merely showed video of its main proponents "spreading misinformation" before the "science changed". An injunction was quickly issued and it was quietly taken behind the barn and put down.
They always keep inserting little amendments underhandedly, which is my main concern, exactly how they did it here passing the law to obligate mothers to vaccinate their kids.
It gets to a point where people ignore or engage in fraud as a matter of basic necessity. I wonder if the ruling class ever realizes they're normalizing disregard of the law, and how that erodes their power.
"Dying societies accumulate laws like dying men accumulate remedies." -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
That is one of my favorite quotes and I had the thought that elites develop these self-destructive memes, that spreads throughout society and among themselves, leading to erosion of hierachy and power as a form of nature balacing itself.
The only explanation that makes some sense in my (weird) brain.
I see folks celebrating what they think are wins, and they are wins but little ones. In the meantime (IMHO) they miss the fact that overall little has changed in the big picture and we're still hurtling towards some end whose design goes back to the 50s, and that these people mean to see this through to their desired end. But hope remains...
I understand a lot of people want to follow general recommendations, almost everyone I know got willingly vaccinated (still can't believe it, but that's the world). Why can't they allow a few to make choices on their own?
I have a few opinions on why. As I wrote multiple times, the next pandemic will me massive so I think their models implicate they would be able to handle the next one by scaling mRNA globally.
Which I vehemently disagree.
That part is the pretext to scaling. Still letting people choose is "another conversation".
My theory is that having a common enemy to distract real conversation is just too good not to take advantage of that
To me - this is super scary and a very slippery slope!
The scary part is by design, they want people not being able to properly process inforamtion and think and the slippery slope is real.
It’s frightening, what’s so hard, for me at least, is who do you trust? Sceptical of my own scepticism.
Buckle up 💪🏻😈 Fight back!
I only trust myself and judge the information and evidence for myself. I do recommeded everyone do the same, but this is my full time job and people have their lives, so in that regard, do what I do often.
Trust your gut. Always, above all else.
Professor - Notice how Art 4 was snuck in while the farmers protest? More to come on the Pfizer Guillotine. "almost all elites got vaccinated" Insiders and those intelligent enough, saline for filmed PSA and public vax appearances, otherwise, large Xmas envelope for Dr. who issued fake certs. Nobody with means and brains got the shot, ever. As you know, those two things are not mutually exclusive. And none of the elites subscribe to collectivist "its for the common good" idiocy. It's all about them and the rest of us be damned Mr. Mulder.
Hate to break it to people but the solution is to leave society. Become independent. Learn laws to avoid their tax laws etc.
👀
If possible, yes. At a personal level it is a great solution, but society wise we need to stand, but I understand it perfectly.
That's a solution only if you don't care about much else from society.
Thinking radical things are the only way to go is part of the polarization long term players exploit so well.
at least the French are big on mass revolt.
perhaps they'll be outraged enough to forcibly remove the current WEF puppet-in-chief and replace him with a fresh new WEF puppet-in-chief
The elites got it. ?? Did they really? Or did they get the same thing FauxQi, Obiden, Harris, and Obummer got? Saline solution. A vitamin shot.
I first wrote about the on April 22, 2022.
https://edwin797.substack.com/p/saline-shot
Oh some elites got it all right. And some did not. Pascal Nadjani explained it.
Pascal Najadi is a very interestingly constructed farce! None of the true Swiss opposition trust him at all. Look where did his legal action against the prime- and health minister (Alain Berset) go since 2022?? Did anything come out of that big fluffy fanfare??: zilch. Or using a popular term nowadays: "Zero Emission".
Off topic. But when you last came back on the bird app, I asked what your opinion was about a 9x jabbed 55 yo mother who seemed to be getting "better" from LC. So I learned more today.
1. Covid infection in March 2020 but she's unable to produce antibodies only "polyclonals"
2. CD4/CD8 ratio was only 12
3. Developed neutropenia
4. After 9 vaxxes she seems to have finally developed some "immunity". Worried about "overdoing" the jabs
5. Her last bloodwork shows everything as "normal"
Question: would it be because she wasn't developing antibodies the reason the jabs were not toxic to her? Just curious what your hypothesis would be. Tnx! Screenshot of her tweets mentioning "bloodwork" https://ibb.co/LJz5SyH
True -Disturbing