I’m a little confused by your analysis of this paper. In it you state that the Sars cov2 virus inhibits hiv-1 infectivity. In your conclusion you state “I guess being exposed to spike is not such a good thing.
To my uneducated ears it sounds like you’re saying on one hand that COVID or the jab will reduce the infectivity of hiv-1 (which to me sounds like a good thing), but then you conclude that it’s not.
I refer to that paper in my “Things Hidden Since the Splicing”, a old thread (it’s a post here) on how to protect yourself against virus, and incidentally the jab.
"<i>And now we finally have, mechanistically, a clue why forms of B3, and its metabolites help to rescue, and recover people so much, so fast.</i>"
But does this paper give any indication which form of B3 would be most effective? Some say nicotinic acid ("flush" niacin, recommended by Dimitry Kats and others), some say nicotinamide (Dr. Joseph Mercola in a very recent article). Any thoughts?
Whatever the person prefer/can afford. Some prefer Niacin (me), other Nicotinamide. If you want for mitochondrial recovery, etc, and can afford, but Nicotinamide Mononucleotide.
The paper doesn't mention B3 in any shape, that was me connection the unexplodred dots =).
Flush Niacin has other, systemic physiological effects, and I do prefer it, but some people can't handle the MINIMUM discomfort and think the flush is a allergic reaction (it is NOT).
Nicotinamide has other effects, I have used both, even together and prefer Niacin (Flush). Up to you. Nicotinamide Mononucleotide is also a (more expensive) good option.
I suspect that a combination of niacin and niacinamide is optimal... Niacin is directly anti-inflammatory, niacinamide is closer to NAD+. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35320002/
Using both together will spike your glucose, and with time can make you insulin resistant, I literally tested it myself. I prefer Niacin, but people should read up, and decide for themselves. I also hack my own metabolism, so I end up with sufficient NAD+ Even during massive infections.
I already left the breadcrumb somewhere about this one =)
Swear in my mind I replied to this. Long term niacin/niacinamide supplementation, apparently messes with some of the Insulin genes, the evidence for insulin resistance from the supplements is real though, the genes are kinda in the middle (for me).
I wonder if the ER stress is one of the causes of long covid? E.g. The unfolded protein response and cellular senescence. A Review in the Theme: Cellular Mechanisms of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling in Health and Disease: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpcell.00334.2014
I’m a little confused by your analysis of this paper. In it you state that the Sars cov2 virus inhibits hiv-1 infectivity. In your conclusion you state “I guess being exposed to spike is not such a good thing.
To my uneducated ears it sounds like you’re saying on one hand that COVID or the jab will reduce the infectivity of hiv-1 (which to me sounds like a good thing), but then you conclude that it’s not.
What am I missing?
Thanks in advance.
The spike down regulates BST 2, being exposed to large quantities of the spike will cause a massive drop on it.
No, the jab doesn't have the E protein, only the virus has, the viral infection might have that effect, the Jab has only the worst possible effects.
First half is about the virus, BST half is about the jab
Shit. That's bad and explains the HIV info slipping out.
Re B vitamins and covid, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428453/
I refer to that paper in my “Things Hidden Since the Splicing”, a old thread (it’s a post here) on how to protect yourself against virus, and incidentally the jab.
"<i>And now we finally have, mechanistically, a clue why forms of B3, and its metabolites help to rescue, and recover people so much, so fast.</i>"
But does this paper give any indication which form of B3 would be most effective? Some say nicotinic acid ("flush" niacin, recommended by Dimitry Kats and others), some say nicotinamide (Dr. Joseph Mercola in a very recent article). Any thoughts?
Whatever the person prefer/can afford. Some prefer Niacin (me), other Nicotinamide. If you want for mitochondrial recovery, etc, and can afford, but Nicotinamide Mononucleotide.
The paper doesn't mention B3 in any shape, that was me connection the unexplodred dots =).
Flush Niacin has other, systemic physiological effects, and I do prefer it, but some people can't handle the MINIMUM discomfort and think the flush is a allergic reaction (it is NOT).
Nicotinamide has other effects, I have used both, even together and prefer Niacin (Flush). Up to you. Nicotinamide Mononucleotide is also a (more expensive) good option.
I suspect that a combination of niacin and niacinamide is optimal... Niacin is directly anti-inflammatory, niacinamide is closer to NAD+. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35320002/
Using both together will spike your glucose, and with time can make you insulin resistant, I literally tested it myself. I prefer Niacin, but people should read up, and decide for themselves. I also hack my own metabolism, so I end up with sufficient NAD+ Even during massive infections.
I already left the breadcrumb somewhere about this one =)
Curious, I wonder why taking them together spikes glucose?
Swear in my mind I replied to this. Long term niacin/niacinamide supplementation, apparently messes with some of the Insulin genes, the evidence for insulin resistance from the supplements is real though, the genes are kinda in the middle (for me).
Spitballing… could this be suggesting a possible attempt to engineer a contagious HIV “vaccine?”
Yeah at this point anything is possible, because only SARS 1 and 2 E protein do that, and nobody knows where the hell SARS 1 came from 👀
I wonder if the ER stress is one of the causes of long covid? E.g. The unfolded protein response and cellular senescence. A Review in the Theme: Cellular Mechanisms of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling in Health and Disease: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpcell.00334.2014