36 Comments
User's avatar
skylover's avatar

Great post ! my wife's friend (covishield 2 doses) developed serious eye problem (forgot the name) and taking daily steroid as otherwise she will lose vision anytime in coming months or years, this steroid too wont help in long run too but atleast the red ,popping out eyes and itching and all things wont happen(this is what the doctor said) , soon after her daughter developed vision issues and got high power specs ( i dont think its related but mentioned still, the child is not vaxed).. ..one thing would like to add regarding use of aspirin, one knowledgeable doctor told me that if someone is taking aspirin for more than 21 days they must take famocid(or anything similar ) too, else there might be problems, then one of my friends mom was advised aspirin low dose after one operation for 6 months, she developed diverticulitis, hinted them about aspirin long term side effect and diverticulitis and then it was found that aspirin was the culprit, doctor did not recommend any antacid with it... i am not expert, but just try to understand the happenings with some logic, maybe this info will be useful... Mnay thanks for your articles...also can i have your email? thanks again

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

I find daily steroid usage egregious to say the least, long-term that will bring more problems than be helpful with her eye conditions, but now I wonder what is her eye condition, if it is related to clotting, anything I suspect regardless of cause, there must be many other possible treatments and supplement that could help her. To each their own I guess, some people refuse to believe anything else but doctors and drugs.

Yes that information is helpful and you are correct on some of your assertions (aspirin being aggressive to the stomach) but the diverculitis is new to me, I find it hard to believe it was the cause unless she is sensitive towards the compound, or it was too aggressive to her gut mucosa (it can happen, but takes many many months).

My e-mail is hiddencomplexity@tutanota.com. Comment here letting me know you got it so I can edit out =).

Expand full comment
skylover's avatar

bytheway u asked her the name of the eye disease, its uveitis. happened after around 8/9 months after 2nd dose of covishield..... she had it long back, it got reactivated in a bad way, before what she had got cured or was under total control.....now its okay with daily medication and some steroid doses..

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

It didn't take me long -> Infectious Uevitis - An Enigma https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433124/

Tuberculosis (well known latent pathogen) also known to inflict Uevitis, so it fits the overall observations of jabbing -> immune suppression -> latent infection wakes up -> months passes damage tallies up and becomes perceptible.

Would advise her to see if there is ANY latent infection laying around in her body.

Expand full comment
skylover's avatar

you mean some infection without symptoms as of now? as anyways she is on steroid so things will stay supressed ..

Expand full comment
skylover's avatar

Saved, thank you!

Expand full comment
An Old Doc's avatar

Another outstanding effort! BTW I sent you a message via Turanota.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

I just replied to your e-mail before reading this message, coincidence !

Expand full comment
DrSDRK's avatar

Thanks for sharing the article. I read an interesting study on the same:

Risk assessment of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination 💉

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Besides elevated blood glucose and the tendency towards obesity, could the toxicity of Metformin to mitochondria be an ancillary factor in the higher mortality rate among diabetics from COVID???

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

In a small percentage and subset of patients on Metformin treatment, perhaps that may be the case, but it has been one of my points in regards to this, that many diabetics live under the assumption that the magic pill will get rid of the excess sugar relying on medication to control their glucose, without adhering to a proper diet.

Would very much suspect most of them had poor glucose control. At the core of the issue, this is really "it", excess sugar molecules floating around... well, an over simplification, but I think you get my point.

Expand full comment
DrSDRK's avatar

Ocular adverse reactions after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine may include eye pain, redness, swelling and inflammation in the eye area, or itchy, watery eyes. Some people may also experience visual disturbances, such as blurry or double vision, or sensitivity to light.

These reactions in certain cases, are more serious , such as inflammation of the optic nerve.

It's believed that these ocular adverse reactions are related to the immune response triggered by the vaccine...

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

Thank you for your work and suggestions for how to treat. I hope you and others find the following tool useful ...

Searching matchyourbatch.org VAERS records for: ( Type: Covid19, Covid19-2 ) ( Manufacturer: Janssen, Pfizer-Biontech, Moderna, Novavax, Unknown ) ( Symptoms includes (using OR): eye, visual, vision, blur, blind, retina, ocular, optic, ophthal, opthal, optom, diplopia, glaucoma, aura, photop )

48,590 events reported through April 21, 2023

NOTE: VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. (Source: CDC)

Adding the condition to search for serious vision-related adverse events ...

VAERS records for: ( Type: Covid19, Covid19-2 ) ( Manufacturer: Janssen, Pfizer-Biontech, Moderna, Novavax, Unknown ) ( Show only: died, life-threatening, permanently disabled, possible miscarriage or stillbirth ) ( Symptoms includes (using OR): eye, visual, vision, blur, blind, retina, ocular, optic, ophthal, opthal, optom, diplopia, glaucoma, aura, photop )

3,692 events reported through April 21, 2023

Of which: 392 died 10.6% | 989 life-threatening 26.8% | 2,618 permanently disabled 70.9% | 58 possible miscarriage or stillbirth 1.6%

Visualize the results by age, sex, batch number(s), location, days to death, vax date, and more. Read the individual reports.

See more about the tool at matchyourbatch.substack.com

MatchYourBatch.org is intended to provide visual exploration of the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data for individuals, clinicians, researchers, and scientists. At present, only COVID-19 related products can be searched, with the hope of adding all current data available from VAERS.

Expand full comment
ThineOwnPalace's avatar

A diabetic (vaccinated for covid-19) friend of mine has developed sudden onset crvo. Doctors baffled as to why. Her diabetes is well managed with a good diet. Currently not responding well to crvo treatment. She is open to considering vaccine injury as an option but has apparently tested negative for thrombocytopenia. Would a crvo vaccine injury present with clotting issues? Thanks!

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Similar to what I described here, the "problem" with the clotting in regards to the optical vasculature is that they are "micro" clots, and picking them up on blood tests is really hard unless the lab testing up very sensitive or highly specific markers.

Vaccine injury has been implicated in almost a dozen different clotting problems and clotting cascade, even if her diabetes is well-controlled it can "help" the vaccine initiate a clotting cascade. I would suggest perhaps going off whatever she is taking (in regards to anticlotting medication) and try the enzymes, and a few other supplements IF she is comfortable with them.

But the enzymes ain't much of a choice if she wants to improve. So far the only substances that break down the Spike when it persists in the body.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Speaking of the clots, I'm curious about your thoughts regarding the following info - I came across a tweet string from @Greg21143362 who claims that the white clots are simple polymeric condensates of the phospholipids carriers in the m-RNA vaxxes. The reaction is catalyzed by tin. Once the catalytic condensation reaction has been initiated, it can't be stopped. The white clots remain in solution while warm (body temp, presumably) and precipitate out into the white strands when the body cools postmortem. Assuming this is true, I would think the reaction is limited to the quantity of phospholipids one receives in the shots. I wonder what the effects of having this material in suspension in one's blood are? If the reported increase in the "thickness" of the blood and increases speed in which clots form could be explained by this. (This is way beyond my knowledge but interesting to learn about. So many questions compared to the number of answers...)

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

What Old Doc said. The "polymeric" angle though is in the right avenue of inquiry, but the target is mistaken. I need to do a lot of work and reading to properly formulate my idea (won't even call it an hypothesis).

Expand full comment
An Old Doc's avatar

That seems unlikely, there is not nearly enough of LNPs in the jabs to form what is seen. These are microscopic quantities & macroscopic clots.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

My ex partner is still getting ocular migranes and general headaches almost 2 years later after 2 jabs. Have a feeling there is no final 'you're safe' point, though I hope for her sake there would be.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

The primary intervention should be the enzymes and they are NOT a suggestion. If I could punch the vaccinated and force them to take them, I would.

The rest would help the body heal, and recover function, limit damage, but the enzymes are a must because there are persistent micro clots in a lot of people, doiblng little damage that tally up over time.

Expand full comment
An Old Doc's avatar

I would concur with the enzymes, but I also recommend NAC. Ivermectin has multiple effects in relation to spike protein disease, it seems to be beneficial in many people over time. I know that at the FLCCC conference Dr Kory & others continue to utilize it as a mainstay along with Nattokinase. I will say that Serrapeptase was not mentioned that I recall, but it's something I am going to try related to workout recovery. Being over 60 but still very fit, I know that I am prone to more muscle soreness & strange 'migratory' inflammation. Increasing my daily NAC (from 1200 to 1800mg) seems to have some benefit. I am going to do a trial of even higher dosage NAC + glycine as well. And let me be a broken record: we are individuals and I remind EVERY PATIENT that treatment is a research study of N=1 subject.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

NAC is in the list Doc, it is in all my lists, as melatonin, but I talked so much about melatonin I just forget some people never heard of the abundant positive effects of the supplement.

Ivermectin is somewhat very hard to come by, at least for now, to so many people, that I leave as a "choice" if the person has access to it, "doesn't hurt to use it", otherwise I abstain of recommending by sheer difficulty. Some of the prices some people send me are INSANE.

I highly advise you to add serrapeptase (you may take both enzymes together for compounding effects), I had much better systemic response to serrapeptase than natto, serra being often referred to as a systemic enzyme (goes easier into the brain, apparently).

Being over 60, even if you are fit, might want to experiment with melatonin too, in case you never did.

Concur with your closing remarks. I often advise people to keep a "medical diary" of some sorts, best decision I ever made.

Expand full comment
skylover's avatar

true that! i have increased NAC to 1800-2000mg with around 2.5 g Glycine, and yes i feel the difference, i think we can take NAC upto 3 grams a day ? regarding IVM what dosage you recommend weekly(12mg is usual)? i used to take but then stopped since feb/march 2022 ...maybe it will be useful again, as theres too much of spike everywhere?

Expand full comment
DoorlessCarp🐭's avatar

Dr Kevin McCairn describes the eyes as windows on the brain, he is certain that these micro-occlusions must be all over the brain.

Expand full comment
An Old Doc's avatar

This is why we do an ophalmoscopic examination of patients, we are looking at CNS blood vessels. Having such clots visible in an office setting provides an easily performed 'test.' Which reminds me, I need to get a new ophthalmoscope!

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

They are, it is just really hard to diagnose and get imaging, some have a hard time doing it even post-mortem.

Still recoverable if people supplement enough, with peptides it is completely recoverable, but expensive.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

One of the bigger problems with SARS-CoV-2 (and "vaccine") spikes is their severe toxicity to mitochondria. Long COVID is at least partially due to mitochondrial damage. Metformin ALSO damages mitochondria. For anyone with a spike problem, Metformin seems like a very bad idea!:

"The main effect of metformin is inhibition of the mitochondrial transport chain complex-I, which essentially poisons the mitochondria."—

Metformin toxicity - EMCrit Project

https://emcrit.org/ibcc/metformin/

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Short-term Metformin is worth the "cost" alone because of the 20 other positive impacts if induces especially in Long COVID. The other suggested supplements negative the mitochondrial impact, this is why I said "synergy".

A few months of Metformin was the best decision I ever made, and other people with LC too. Helps with many immune mediated issues (especially from the jab)

Expand full comment
An Old Doc's avatar

Metformin has a number of positive effects, a dear friend is using it as part of her cancer protocol.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

It is the only drug that I suggest. Aspirin is growing fast as the possible second one. Metformin is almost tailored against the jab pathways that induce pathology.

Expand full comment
Elchavodel8's avatar

Hi John Paul. What do you think about berberine, in terms of toxicity? I have been taking it (500mg, TID) for a 3 or so weeks and I think it has been helpful. I think I have caught the bug a few times now. Luckily, I have been doing many of the things you have mentioned before and each time has felt less and less of an issue.

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Hello. Berberine is only "toxic" if you take at high dosages, 500-1000 mg is the average daily dosage for most people.

If you have been doing the things I mentioned, you most likely severely mitigated any possible long-term damage, so you are fine. I also got the bug a bunch of times until a few months ago, I think high dosing Melatonin help me more than the other supplements (I have a fucked up gut, so I am basically melatonin deficient).

Expand full comment
Elchavodel8's avatar

Thanks! I think we're in the same boat in the gut department. As a kid I was overexposed to antibiotics due to medical misdiagnosis. I try to eat at least a little bit of fermented food frequently like kombucha or kefir, hopefully to give the little guys some help down there. As far as the melatonin, I have been taking it for a while, knowing the benefits but I found that more than 5-6mg at night increases the drowsiness the next day, so I stick to that range unless I feel sick, then I might go to 20mg at night.

Expand full comment
Legallady4's avatar

are people who require cornea transplants at risk if the corneas are from a vaccinated donor?

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Risk of clots, not absolutely not. Risk of rejection little above the average, yes.

Organ transplant from a vaccinated person may be a real problem, but the cornea isn't.

Expand full comment