My focus has always been SARS and it's leviathanic effects on health and the world, but meaningful research is and will become sparse. While I have the freedom of writing "whatever I feel like" because of my supporters, if you have a topic you would like to write about, comment below.
I pretty much learn something from all your meanderings :) but have you written anything on the fringe healing arts... frequency, vibration, sound, homeopathy, local/non local energy.... some yrs ago I helped a tongue cancer pt thru their last yr of life and a couple of the drs used Russian energy devices that were supposedly monitoring the energy fields. Seems there's good science behind some stuff until a "get rich quick guy" gets ahold of it and messes it all up.
I have not written about those in depth, but have stated multiple times people should ground. And red light therapy is also something everyone should consider.
Writing about more subjective topics is kinda hard for me. Especially my favorite. Mind over body lol
I have MS and long Covid, had become disabled over five years. I love your articles and have indeed benefited greatly from them. I seem to ve recovering my health finally, both from your suggested supplements and from low-dose naltrexone, anti-inflammatory and anti-aging. Also from homeopathic mercurius soubilis 200 c. I wanted to let you know. Hod bless you!
More and more I come across comments on X about unvaccinated recently getting covid and noting that their symptoms have been difficult and long-lasting. There seems to be a residual pride in not using strong, effective anti-virals such as ivermectin/HCQ/etc.., coupled with a residual pride in not testing for C19 (I think had covid, but it's just a cold so I won't test for it). So grateful to continue to hear about the realities here that covid is not just a cold, and, the unvaccinated can be very much harmed by it, irrespective of vax shedding concerns and realities.
I have been trying to drive that point home for the better part of 18 months, to my own detriment (a large portion of my readership believes it is all just the vaccine, regardless of data or evidence), and they are now getting the brunt of it.
You remain one of very few ‘experts’ who can clearly see and define the damage as being vax and virus. I still struggle to understand why so many are so entrenched that it’s only the vax that is the problem.
You’ve done so much on developing protocols to recover somewhat neurological function but is there anything protective we can do? Either prophylactically, during infection or post infection? I have my own theories and Ky pathway and preventing microclotting comes into it heavily but wonder if you have anything to add?
Money, attention, and the illusion of low-level political influencers (belonging to Elon's ingroup). That is why there is a significant focus on anti-mRNA things, it brings you a lot of money.
Whenever someone criticizes you lose money (I am the perfect example). I also think some of them believe in their own propaganda and in the narrative they sell, ergo "consuming your own supply".
I am looking into prophylactically but it is insanely hard to time, you need to time before you even know you are infected, and how we do that. Limiting inflammation, pumping yourself full of NAD (thus you steer your Tryptophan Metabolism away from KP), and phospholipids/choline, and taurine.
Inflammation/ROS lowering is central.
I do not know how to avoid the massive obliteration of cell death so far (as I don't have a lab with a cluster to do the things that need to be done lol, maybe the new AI scientist from google will solve this).
I’m telling you, pumping your nose full of Interferon a2b spray for a couple of days once you know you are infected is the best response so far. They are starting to show interest in it in Shanghai again after all the research seeming to fade away
So.... they released a brain weapon that messes up the same areas that they made AI to be able to handle. Whether we want it or not, we'll be relying on AI more as our cognitive abilities are further destroyed with each exposure. What a lovely picture you paint... not :(
Covid was always a neurological weapon, everything else was just a byproduct of "crude human design", at least I have held that opinion since the end of 2023.
The problem is... these changes are affecting AI development... lol and we get into another conspiracy, entirely.
I’ve been making this point for some time, reliable AI will be needed to make up for the societal loss of neurological function. But I think the point here is about the skills needed for AI research and development being affected which is yet another issue!
The timing for the degradation of the very specific, very precise regions of the brain we use to do Machine Learning is rather... interesting. Peculiar. Poignant.
I know a few ML guys and they are observing this degradation among their peers. Without wanting to sound elitistic, the people who have an easier time gauging their cognitive loss are usually at the higher end of knowledge work (PhDs pick up these losses and fluctuations abnormally fast).
I agree. I’ve noted some of the reports looking at older people have seen less clear decline which is pretty obvious to me as it’s lost in amongst natural decline in executive function
“The significant, widespread, societal-wide impact of SARS-CoV-2 is impossible to deny, and myopic focus isn’t benefiting anyone, because loud voices have a directional effect on research now.”
Yes, though to be honest, this has long been standard operating procedure regarding certain taboo health subjects. Two things largely determine the direction of discussion:
1. If there is an identifiable culprit with major money and influence. In my case with multiple chemical sensitivity, it's the chemical industry. They're completely insurmountable. With SARS-COV2 and the vaccine, it's government, pharma, and the rest of the standard medical paradigm. In these cases, at best, we'll see media discussions that are designed to suppress the stories, in part by using the dog whistle that the existence of harm is “controversial”. That whistle is to send readers off the right path and perhaps to deflect researchers/funding.
2. The development of a drug. It's amazing how quickly an illness will transition from non-existent to entirely fact-based with the release of a new drug.
Unfortunately, the area of subtle brain injury is easy to sweep under the rug. While language is an obvious indicator of a problem, the person is often still able to communicate sufficiently well. People take that as a sign that the person is fine. I don't know how much scanning has advanced, but I had to have neuropsychological testing because some types of brain damage are too diffuse to be picked up by scanning. Either way, these tests are generally too expensive or are not going to be supported by insurance, so people will be walking around having no idea whether or not their changes are due to brain injury. Other people will just view them as either stupid, lazy, or assholes.
My executive function took a hit and it took a large toll on my ability to do my job troubleshooting problems. Organization and multitasking? Forget it. My short term memory sucked and it was exasperating some of the important people that I had to work with. Cues that would normally launch me into action didn't work anymore. Over time I've come to understand a lot, but it's taken well over a decade, and even if I can see where my problem areas are, I still can't be certain in individual situations. I sometimes wind up having to make excuses to people who may not want to hear them. Having a diagnosis at least helps with awareness of having a problem and can help a person to understand it to a degree, even if it's a very nebulous, ambiguous, and difficult to navigate problem.
“Fatigue, cognitive friction, and brain fog are likely the symptoms of a brain struggling to function optimally with an altered, less efficient, metabolic landscape.”
I don't know if this is what you mean by “cognitive friction”, but I find myself in situations that can be brutally difficult to resolve, such as simple mental tasks like making absurdly innocuous decisions.
There's a lot more detail to the story, but the bottom line is that this life can be a lot more of a struggle than it appears to outsiders who can quickly lose patience with you.
But the taboo comes from "our side" of the conversation. Anti-mRNA spawned into a global industry that generates a few hundred million dollars per year, and borderline brainwashed a substantial number of people into "its just the flu" and "its all the mRNA bro". The other side (pharma, government, etc) is as bad indeed, but our side is causing significant damage, at large, and still selling their preferred talking points because it generates a lot of revenue.
Standing for truth, data, and evidence literally costs money now.
2. Well, as Goldman Sachs once asked its investors when considering large investments in biotech "Is curing disease a sustainable business model ?" Lol. A lot of research is now driven by "targeted treatments". You can patent, you can charge an absurd amount of money, and you can "lock in" a substantial number of patients for a couple decades at least, that is why monoclonal are all the rage, recurring revenue stream (they never tell people that, do they ?).
Subtle, subclinical, and very early on brain injury is ignored, as with almost any subclinical conditions. A large portion of the medical profession is ill-equipped, and has an egregious understanding of data (they are all bad at math, coming from someone who could have a PhD in math early in life, I gave up on it). It is inconceivable for many of them to "color outside the lines".
Scanning has advanced quite well the past few years, but I think the largest leap will be using current tech + diffusion models/deep learning, because AI can pick up details, trends and hidden patterns a human expert could never, thus enabling us to diagnose extremely early and address the issue, avoiding long-term consequences.
I have found myself into a similar situation multiple times in life per my list of injuries, but you can "manipulate" neuroplasticity quite well, from a lower investment threshold to a larger one.
By cognitive friction that is exactly what I meant, the fact that it takes a significant amount of "brain power" to solve certain specific tasks that shouldn't take that much cognitive investment, and you can feel the energy fluctuation sometimes.
As I said, I have been on your boat, and without wanting to toot my own horn, it is one of the reasons I came up with the brain stack. While milage may vary between people, given the information you left here, it may benefit you even if you have to tinker with aspects of it.
On another point, it seems that you are getting the research data now that is enabling you to confirm your thesis about what Covid does, both principally and as ugly side-chain effects. I want to remind you that we don't live in your head or focus on this issue all the time. I know you want us to read and remember the massive network of your articles and their massively interlinked ideas and implications, and we do our best to do that. However, most of us can't hold it all in our heads for that long, even if we weren't affected by Covid damage.
If you are reaching the defendable end of developing and supporting your thesis, and even though I know you hate writing summaries or revisiting old material, I'd like to ask you to write one article that does not discuss research papers but simply describes what your thesis is, what the side chain effects are that can also do damage but are not central, and then state what in your stack does what to improve each aspect of the thesis damage and the side chain damage and why it works.
You can provide "HERE" links to refer to papers you wrote that dealt with that aspect or this aspect of your thesis but no summaries of any papers, no research reports analyzed. Such a paper would pull everything about your thesis into one place, a top-of-the-tree explication of what Covid does to people and what to do for each aspect to heal (or even to become better than before).
You'll hate doing it, I'm sure. :-))
However, it will almost certainly be incredibly helpful to most of us out here who are not immersed in this stuff for hours every day. It will probably challenge you to put down concisely *all* the important stuff in your head and your articles in a way everyone can follow, and those who want to drill down will have the HERE links to follow. You might consider asking Grok or ChatGPT to help make your prose clear (even in English, which I know is not your first language though you do a great job with it).
When I have done this kind of exercise myself, I have found it an excellent way to discipline my own thinking, clarify areas I thought I had clear in my head but actually did not, and reduce the page count for those not as knowledgeable in that area as I was so that their comprehension of the critical and important aspects of the area could be as clear and as effective and *useful* for them as possible.
In 2020 when Covid first came out, I wrote a 75-page paper discussing everything I knew about it. I realized nobody actually read it usefully. Eventually, I boiled it down to 7 pages, with a two-page action summary. People used that more appropriately.
Recently, I put all my thoughts about another medical subject down in one 43 page paper. The first 41 pages is explanation of causes and effects, cautions, what to use, where to order, then I put a 2-page action plan at the end. Several people have benefitted already because they could work step by step through the first 41 pages in order to set up the protocol but then only had to print out the last two pages to keep with their ordered items to carry out the four-month protocol day by day. (Email me if you want me to send it to you.)
Most of us are not here purely for intellectual curiosity (although that is certainly an aspect for me). We're here to understand this complex problem and use that understanding and your recommendations to *heal*.
That's what I'm asking for here. A summary "top-of-the-tree" paper that discusses your thesis and side-chains, provides an explanation of what things to do to heal the damages and why they work, cautions about the substances used, and then a short 2-3 page printable action plan that people can put on the counter in their kitchen and use easily on a daily basis to attain healing within a defined period of time.
Consider yourself challenged. :-) Do you know enough yet to do this? Will you do it?
No Language Model can deal with the level of complexity in a couple of my more "knowledge-dense" articles, they simply can't handle the sheer complexity of all the pathways, all the intricacies, and they get lost insanely fast. Models tend to overfit and oversimplify and a lot get lost in the process when you ask to make it clearer/simpler.
To give you perspective, I asked ONE question, just a question to Google Gemini reasoning model and it broke the model, it thought for 4 minutes and broke the model lmao.
LLM parsing your own writing leaves a lot of "traces" and it feels incredibly lazy to me, unless you keep prompting over and over, and it soon enough information gets lost in the context window.
Any time I think I am reaching what is to me an undoubtedly almost impossible to "debunk" position I... find something new. The more I dig through trying to find that common thread interlinking a substantial number of the avenues I have gone down I find a new link.
I don't think I or a language model (or multiple to lower the context burden) would be able to boil down to the op 3, because the top 3, need another 3, that need another 3 to fully parse the information. The same goes for the stack, which comes from a first principles perspective and will have multiple, overlapping effects on the systemic damage the virus produces.
Parsing the articles isn't exactly the problem, the problem is context handling (the amount of information) and retrieval of the important information. As an example, it is much easier for AI to pick the important parts of a scientific paper because the context is "limited".
The way I research and write (and basically how my brain works in a sense) makes dit ifficult for a Language Model to handle the amount of complexity, there are too many interconnected layers and information gets lost super fast.
We will get there I am sure and faster than expected.
Sorry, Moriarty, I had a big project and am only now getting back to this comment of yours. First, I apologize for not being clear enough. I did not mean that I thought you should use an AI to do your work. I was actually thinking of something more like a simple Grammarly. You would be doing all your thinking and writing yourself, but once the document is written, you would just use a simple software review to help clean up your English so things would be clearer. I know of a company called Prismatext that helps a person learn a foreign language by interspersing into an English book words of the foreign language. Seeing the foreign word in the largely English text helps a person learn that word and internalize it with the context. I haven't tried it yet (too busy) but being.a reader, this appeals to me. Having a simple Grammarly give you better spelling and words or sentence structure would not trespass into your work but would help you learn better English so your posts would be clearer.
As for thinking you are at a final stage and have figured things out, well, what you are saying about finding three new things is unfortunately true in your own experience as well, sadly, in mine. It seems that C19 and the spike just keep opening up new possibilities for harm, like a giant dictionary. Perhaps we can turn that around and view its contribution to humanity as being a massive uptick in knowledge about how the human body works and how to improve it and keep it balanced. So perhaps something good is coming from this disaster. Anyway, I take back my suggestion that you write a top-down summary of this thing. I will await further discoveries from you. :-)
Moriarty, this work is really pulling things together for me. Several months ago, I had my first significant Covid infection. It was so much like releasing a food addiction and so focused just in my sinuses that it didn't even occur to me that it was Covid. This was also the first time I had a neuro effect - my sense of smell made everything smell a little burnt. I work with an energy healer / medical intuitive, and we tracked the spike population, which took several weeks (even with anti-spike supplements) to decline to zero (ish). I found that Lion's Mane mushroom helped the neuro effect disappear in about a week. I also found a little later when I did a Vitamin D test, that somehow my serum D had declined from around 80+ to about 40, so the severity of this infection was due at least in part to low D. I've been trying to get my D level back up and have found I need twice as much D supplement as before. Not sure why, but if C19 also damages D processing besides the factors you are discussing, it might be something worth adding into the equation.
Besides microclotting affecting the microvasculature of specific organs (which play a role in the metabolic pathway of Vit D), I have yet to find a conclusive pathway that would be backed by evidence.
I have long stated that the viral infection creates a significant, substantial "vitamin D hole" in which every single person that gets infected, will suffer a substantial drop in Vitamin D that lasts weeks. I think the viral infection and its consequences is affecting Vitamin D Receptor expression too... somehow...
Sounds like you have had a hard row to hoe for a long time. It's crazy our medical system hasn't recognized how common your story is and keeps passing it off as just an outlier. I'm curious, if you don't mind sharing, did Moriarty's Brain stack help any?
In some people it can, but it is a very "weird" drug to me to be using to fix cognitive issues, milage may vary drastically.
My recommended supplementation, with a special focus on long-term creatine, taurine, choline, and thiamine usage will help, other things can also help, such as Lion's Mane (fantastic for cognitive issues), melatonin, whey protein (this one, also long term).
Vitamin D + exercise, grounding, and low-stress levels also help more than one can imagine. I am for the less drastic approach more often than not, unless someone needs otherwise =).
What I’ll never understand is, the humans that unleashed this bio weapon will also have these same problems, right? Or do they have a secret “weapon” med to counteract these unfortunate effects to the brain?
"Unintended consequences" so yes, the vast majority of designers. I think people at the level of Baric maintained themselves safe by sheer absurd expertise, otherwise "it is a clean slate for everyone".
My focus has always been SARS and it's leviathanic effects on health and the world, but meaningful research is and will become sparse. While I have the freedom of writing "whatever I feel like" because of my supporters, if you have a topic you would like to write about, comment below.
I pretty much learn something from all your meanderings :) but have you written anything on the fringe healing arts... frequency, vibration, sound, homeopathy, local/non local energy.... some yrs ago I helped a tongue cancer pt thru their last yr of life and a couple of the drs used Russian energy devices that were supposedly monitoring the energy fields. Seems there's good science behind some stuff until a "get rich quick guy" gets ahold of it and messes it all up.
I have not written about those in depth, but have stated multiple times people should ground. And red light therapy is also something everyone should consider.
Writing about more subjective topics is kinda hard for me. Especially my favorite. Mind over body lol
I have MS and long Covid, had become disabled over five years. I love your articles and have indeed benefited greatly from them. I seem to ve recovering my health finally, both from your suggested supplements and from low-dose naltrexone, anti-inflammatory and anti-aging. Also from homeopathic mercurius soubilis 200 c. I wanted to let you know. Hod bless you!
Thank you for letting me know, this makes me actually happy because I achieved my primary goal of helping people, especially outliers.
Keep recovering, keep in that path =D, so glad to hear this.
Yes. God bless you! All this amazing work and someone recovering with hope. 🙏🏼
Wow. Good work. And I wont sleep tonight. Thanks.
But what ray of hope might you offer up for those looking to reverse this trend before we all cant read what you might right?
Supplementation which I shared recently. To be specific, creatine (long-term), taurine, choline, B complex.
Anything aimed and related to brain health.
Let me say I think Longvida might just be a game changer
Oh how I do enjoy finding a thing hidden in complexity:
"one last yee to our cognitive haw"
clever
I enjoyed writing that lol.
I enjoy your conspiracy and BMO articles
More and more I come across comments on X about unvaccinated recently getting covid and noting that their symptoms have been difficult and long-lasting. There seems to be a residual pride in not using strong, effective anti-virals such as ivermectin/HCQ/etc.., coupled with a residual pride in not testing for C19 (I think had covid, but it's just a cold so I won't test for it). So grateful to continue to hear about the realities here that covid is not just a cold, and, the unvaccinated can be very much harmed by it, irrespective of vax shedding concerns and realities.
I have been trying to drive that point home for the better part of 18 months, to my own detriment (a large portion of my readership believes it is all just the vaccine, regardless of data or evidence), and they are now getting the brunt of it.
Alas time will tell who was honest and correct.
You remain one of very few ‘experts’ who can clearly see and define the damage as being vax and virus. I still struggle to understand why so many are so entrenched that it’s only the vax that is the problem.
You’ve done so much on developing protocols to recover somewhat neurological function but is there anything protective we can do? Either prophylactically, during infection or post infection? I have my own theories and Ky pathway and preventing microclotting comes into it heavily but wonder if you have anything to add?
Money, attention, and the illusion of low-level political influencers (belonging to Elon's ingroup). That is why there is a significant focus on anti-mRNA things, it brings you a lot of money.
Whenever someone criticizes you lose money (I am the perfect example). I also think some of them believe in their own propaganda and in the narrative they sell, ergo "consuming your own supply".
I am looking into prophylactically but it is insanely hard to time, you need to time before you even know you are infected, and how we do that. Limiting inflammation, pumping yourself full of NAD (thus you steer your Tryptophan Metabolism away from KP), and phospholipids/choline, and taurine.
Inflammation/ROS lowering is central.
I do not know how to avoid the massive obliteration of cell death so far (as I don't have a lab with a cluster to do the things that need to be done lol, maybe the new AI scientist from google will solve this).
I’m telling you, pumping your nose full of Interferon a2b spray for a couple of days once you know you are infected is the best response so far. They are starting to show interest in it in Shanghai again after all the research seeming to fade away
Different nasal sprays seem like the best strategy, especially prophylactically, but finding one that works in each country is rather... difficult.
So.... they released a brain weapon that messes up the same areas that they made AI to be able to handle. Whether we want it or not, we'll be relying on AI more as our cognitive abilities are further destroyed with each exposure. What a lovely picture you paint... not :(
Covid was always a neurological weapon, everything else was just a byproduct of "crude human design", at least I have held that opinion since the end of 2023.
The problem is... these changes are affecting AI development... lol and we get into another conspiracy, entirely.
I’ve been making this point for some time, reliable AI will be needed to make up for the societal loss of neurological function. But I think the point here is about the skills needed for AI research and development being affected which is yet another issue!
The timing for the degradation of the very specific, very precise regions of the brain we use to do Machine Learning is rather... interesting. Peculiar. Poignant.
I know a few ML guys and they are observing this degradation among their peers. Without wanting to sound elitistic, the people who have an easier time gauging their cognitive loss are usually at the higher end of knowledge work (PhDs pick up these losses and fluctuations abnormally fast).
I agree. I’ve noted some of the reports looking at older people have seen less clear decline which is pretty obvious to me as it’s lost in amongst natural decline in executive function
"one last yee to our cognitive haw"
That's hilarious lol.
“The significant, widespread, societal-wide impact of SARS-CoV-2 is impossible to deny, and myopic focus isn’t benefiting anyone, because loud voices have a directional effect on research now.”
Yes, though to be honest, this has long been standard operating procedure regarding certain taboo health subjects. Two things largely determine the direction of discussion:
1. If there is an identifiable culprit with major money and influence. In my case with multiple chemical sensitivity, it's the chemical industry. They're completely insurmountable. With SARS-COV2 and the vaccine, it's government, pharma, and the rest of the standard medical paradigm. In these cases, at best, we'll see media discussions that are designed to suppress the stories, in part by using the dog whistle that the existence of harm is “controversial”. That whistle is to send readers off the right path and perhaps to deflect researchers/funding.
2. The development of a drug. It's amazing how quickly an illness will transition from non-existent to entirely fact-based with the release of a new drug.
Unfortunately, the area of subtle brain injury is easy to sweep under the rug. While language is an obvious indicator of a problem, the person is often still able to communicate sufficiently well. People take that as a sign that the person is fine. I don't know how much scanning has advanced, but I had to have neuropsychological testing because some types of brain damage are too diffuse to be picked up by scanning. Either way, these tests are generally too expensive or are not going to be supported by insurance, so people will be walking around having no idea whether or not their changes are due to brain injury. Other people will just view them as either stupid, lazy, or assholes.
My executive function took a hit and it took a large toll on my ability to do my job troubleshooting problems. Organization and multitasking? Forget it. My short term memory sucked and it was exasperating some of the important people that I had to work with. Cues that would normally launch me into action didn't work anymore. Over time I've come to understand a lot, but it's taken well over a decade, and even if I can see where my problem areas are, I still can't be certain in individual situations. I sometimes wind up having to make excuses to people who may not want to hear them. Having a diagnosis at least helps with awareness of having a problem and can help a person to understand it to a degree, even if it's a very nebulous, ambiguous, and difficult to navigate problem.
“Fatigue, cognitive friction, and brain fog are likely the symptoms of a brain struggling to function optimally with an altered, less efficient, metabolic landscape.”
I don't know if this is what you mean by “cognitive friction”, but I find myself in situations that can be brutally difficult to resolve, such as simple mental tasks like making absurdly innocuous decisions.
There's a lot more detail to the story, but the bottom line is that this life can be a lot more of a struggle than it appears to outsiders who can quickly lose patience with you.
But the taboo comes from "our side" of the conversation. Anti-mRNA spawned into a global industry that generates a few hundred million dollars per year, and borderline brainwashed a substantial number of people into "its just the flu" and "its all the mRNA bro". The other side (pharma, government, etc) is as bad indeed, but our side is causing significant damage, at large, and still selling their preferred talking points because it generates a lot of revenue.
Standing for truth, data, and evidence literally costs money now.
2. Well, as Goldman Sachs once asked its investors when considering large investments in biotech "Is curing disease a sustainable business model ?" Lol. A lot of research is now driven by "targeted treatments". You can patent, you can charge an absurd amount of money, and you can "lock in" a substantial number of patients for a couple decades at least, that is why monoclonal are all the rage, recurring revenue stream (they never tell people that, do they ?).
Subtle, subclinical, and very early on brain injury is ignored, as with almost any subclinical conditions. A large portion of the medical profession is ill-equipped, and has an egregious understanding of data (they are all bad at math, coming from someone who could have a PhD in math early in life, I gave up on it). It is inconceivable for many of them to "color outside the lines".
Scanning has advanced quite well the past few years, but I think the largest leap will be using current tech + diffusion models/deep learning, because AI can pick up details, trends and hidden patterns a human expert could never, thus enabling us to diagnose extremely early and address the issue, avoiding long-term consequences.
I have found myself into a similar situation multiple times in life per my list of injuries, but you can "manipulate" neuroplasticity quite well, from a lower investment threshold to a larger one.
By cognitive friction that is exactly what I meant, the fact that it takes a significant amount of "brain power" to solve certain specific tasks that shouldn't take that much cognitive investment, and you can feel the energy fluctuation sometimes.
As I said, I have been on your boat, and without wanting to toot my own horn, it is one of the reasons I came up with the brain stack. While milage may vary between people, given the information you left here, it may benefit you even if you have to tinker with aspects of it.
On another point, it seems that you are getting the research data now that is enabling you to confirm your thesis about what Covid does, both principally and as ugly side-chain effects. I want to remind you that we don't live in your head or focus on this issue all the time. I know you want us to read and remember the massive network of your articles and their massively interlinked ideas and implications, and we do our best to do that. However, most of us can't hold it all in our heads for that long, even if we weren't affected by Covid damage.
If you are reaching the defendable end of developing and supporting your thesis, and even though I know you hate writing summaries or revisiting old material, I'd like to ask you to write one article that does not discuss research papers but simply describes what your thesis is, what the side chain effects are that can also do damage but are not central, and then state what in your stack does what to improve each aspect of the thesis damage and the side chain damage and why it works.
You can provide "HERE" links to refer to papers you wrote that dealt with that aspect or this aspect of your thesis but no summaries of any papers, no research reports analyzed. Such a paper would pull everything about your thesis into one place, a top-of-the-tree explication of what Covid does to people and what to do for each aspect to heal (or even to become better than before).
You'll hate doing it, I'm sure. :-))
However, it will almost certainly be incredibly helpful to most of us out here who are not immersed in this stuff for hours every day. It will probably challenge you to put down concisely *all* the important stuff in your head and your articles in a way everyone can follow, and those who want to drill down will have the HERE links to follow. You might consider asking Grok or ChatGPT to help make your prose clear (even in English, which I know is not your first language though you do a great job with it).
When I have done this kind of exercise myself, I have found it an excellent way to discipline my own thinking, clarify areas I thought I had clear in my head but actually did not, and reduce the page count for those not as knowledgeable in that area as I was so that their comprehension of the critical and important aspects of the area could be as clear and as effective and *useful* for them as possible.
In 2020 when Covid first came out, I wrote a 75-page paper discussing everything I knew about it. I realized nobody actually read it usefully. Eventually, I boiled it down to 7 pages, with a two-page action summary. People used that more appropriately.
Recently, I put all my thoughts about another medical subject down in one 43 page paper. The first 41 pages is explanation of causes and effects, cautions, what to use, where to order, then I put a 2-page action plan at the end. Several people have benefitted already because they could work step by step through the first 41 pages in order to set up the protocol but then only had to print out the last two pages to keep with their ordered items to carry out the four-month protocol day by day. (Email me if you want me to send it to you.)
Most of us are not here purely for intellectual curiosity (although that is certainly an aspect for me). We're here to understand this complex problem and use that understanding and your recommendations to *heal*.
That's what I'm asking for here. A summary "top-of-the-tree" paper that discusses your thesis and side-chains, provides an explanation of what things to do to heal the damages and why they work, cautions about the substances used, and then a short 2-3 page printable action plan that people can put on the counter in their kitchen and use easily on a daily basis to attain healing within a defined period of time.
Consider yourself challenged. :-) Do you know enough yet to do this? Will you do it?
No Language Model can deal with the level of complexity in a couple of my more "knowledge-dense" articles, they simply can't handle the sheer complexity of all the pathways, all the intricacies, and they get lost insanely fast. Models tend to overfit and oversimplify and a lot get lost in the process when you ask to make it clearer/simpler.
To give you perspective, I asked ONE question, just a question to Google Gemini reasoning model and it broke the model, it thought for 4 minutes and broke the model lmao.
LLM parsing your own writing leaves a lot of "traces" and it feels incredibly lazy to me, unless you keep prompting over and over, and it soon enough information gets lost in the context window.
Any time I think I am reaching what is to me an undoubtedly almost impossible to "debunk" position I... find something new. The more I dig through trying to find that common thread interlinking a substantial number of the avenues I have gone down I find a new link.
I don't think I or a language model (or multiple to lower the context burden) would be able to boil down to the op 3, because the top 3, need another 3, that need another 3 to fully parse the information. The same goes for the stack, which comes from a first principles perspective and will have multiple, overlapping effects on the systemic damage the virus produces.
I would like your 43 page paper.
Perhaps you can create an AI agent that parses all your your accumulated posts?
https://x.com/Saboo_Shubham_/status/1893209305249390812
Parsing the articles isn't exactly the problem, the problem is context handling (the amount of information) and retrieval of the important information. As an example, it is much easier for AI to pick the important parts of a scientific paper because the context is "limited".
The way I research and write (and basically how my brain works in a sense) makes dit ifficult for a Language Model to handle the amount of complexity, there are too many interconnected layers and information gets lost super fast.
We will get there I am sure and faster than expected.
Sorry, Moriarty, I had a big project and am only now getting back to this comment of yours. First, I apologize for not being clear enough. I did not mean that I thought you should use an AI to do your work. I was actually thinking of something more like a simple Grammarly. You would be doing all your thinking and writing yourself, but once the document is written, you would just use a simple software review to help clean up your English so things would be clearer. I know of a company called Prismatext that helps a person learn a foreign language by interspersing into an English book words of the foreign language. Seeing the foreign word in the largely English text helps a person learn that word and internalize it with the context. I haven't tried it yet (too busy) but being.a reader, this appeals to me. Having a simple Grammarly give you better spelling and words or sentence structure would not trespass into your work but would help you learn better English so your posts would be clearer.
As for thinking you are at a final stage and have figured things out, well, what you are saying about finding three new things is unfortunately true in your own experience as well, sadly, in mine. It seems that C19 and the spike just keep opening up new possibilities for harm, like a giant dictionary. Perhaps we can turn that around and view its contribution to humanity as being a massive uptick in knowledge about how the human body works and how to improve it and keep it balanced. So perhaps something good is coming from this disaster. Anyway, I take back my suggestion that you write a top-down summary of this thing. I will await further discoveries from you. :-)
I will send my document in a little while.
Moriarty, this work is really pulling things together for me. Several months ago, I had my first significant Covid infection. It was so much like releasing a food addiction and so focused just in my sinuses that it didn't even occur to me that it was Covid. This was also the first time I had a neuro effect - my sense of smell made everything smell a little burnt. I work with an energy healer / medical intuitive, and we tracked the spike population, which took several weeks (even with anti-spike supplements) to decline to zero (ish). I found that Lion's Mane mushroom helped the neuro effect disappear in about a week. I also found a little later when I did a Vitamin D test, that somehow my serum D had declined from around 80+ to about 40, so the severity of this infection was due at least in part to low D. I've been trying to get my D level back up and have found I need twice as much D supplement as before. Not sure why, but if C19 also damages D processing besides the factors you are discussing, it might be something worth adding into the equation.
Besides microclotting affecting the microvasculature of specific organs (which play a role in the metabolic pathway of Vit D), I have yet to find a conclusive pathway that would be backed by evidence.
I have long stated that the viral infection creates a significant, substantial "vitamin D hole" in which every single person that gets infected, will suffer a substantial drop in Vitamin D that lasts weeks. I think the viral infection and its consequences is affecting Vitamin D Receptor expression too... somehow...
Thanks for sharing your experience Steve. What brand of lions mane did you use?
where is the brain stack again? I forgot
https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/brain-stack-21-beyond-the-limits?utm_source=publication-search
Sounds like you have had a hard row to hoe for a long time. It's crazy our medical system hasn't recognized how common your story is and keeps passing it off as just an outlier. I'm curious, if you don't mind sharing, did Moriarty's Brain stack help any?
Would iv ketamine help with these cognitive issues? I know they are using it for depression
In some people it can, but it is a very "weird" drug to me to be using to fix cognitive issues, milage may vary drastically.
My recommended supplementation, with a special focus on long-term creatine, taurine, choline, and thiamine usage will help, other things can also help, such as Lion's Mane (fantastic for cognitive issues), melatonin, whey protein (this one, also long term).
Vitamin D + exercise, grounding, and low-stress levels also help more than one can imagine. I am for the less drastic approach more often than not, unless someone needs otherwise =).
What I’ll never understand is, the humans that unleashed this bio weapon will also have these same problems, right? Or do they have a secret “weapon” med to counteract these unfortunate effects to the brain?
"Unintended consequences" so yes, the vast majority of designers. I think people at the level of Baric maintained themselves safe by sheer absurd expertise, otherwise "it is a clean slate for everyone".
please do away with this mauve page and font. i cant read it
I think you can control the theme on the app, but especially on the browser lol, I have tried many combinations but it always get to someone.
Reading in the e-mail is probably the best.