I am quite innocent of mouse research and expected lab values. You note that there is capillary stalling dynamics from RBC factors and separate from inflammatory cells. In clinical work it would be expensive and unusual to be able to study Il-10. Historically an ESR measurement would indicate inflammatory burden as demonstrated by RBC "stickiness." Currently the favoured measure (particularly in the jurisdiction where this research was done) is CRP, or better hsCRP.
To extend the conclusions toward a useful clinical study I would have liked to see hsCRP as well as the detailed glucose and interleukin assays. I would expect the Il-10 measurements to be proportional to CRP, and thus give usefully accessible clinical information.
Following I would have wanted to see the same study run with a bit of Covid Spike protein- any bets on the outcome? The institution is an hour down the road, and I could almost guarantee that no funding for such a study would be available!
There is good research on the effects of DM on endothelial function and the Spike damage seems similar. I had been telling patients (especially diabetics) for at least thirty years that they lived on the lining of their blood vessels; this has been made very clear with the Covid and vaxx damage.
In your first review of the autistic characteristic, I have described the trait as "intellectual curiosity." Because of the structure and politics of ASD (and ADHD) diagnosis the eleven-dimensional Venn diagram makes it difficult to separate useful traits from deleterious conditions. I did not do well with my grade three teacher, if I had been 65 years younger I might have needed to have been drugged into submission!
Thanks, I appreciate your reviews and presentation of these articles which I would never encounter on my own.
I learned a really fun thing in my adolescence. I had a lot of beloved older relatives who were perhaps on the first rung of senility. They didn't always remember my name. They told the same story over and over. I remember, almost to the day, when I turned the corner from clenching my teeth and tolerating the fifth retelling of some childhood story... to eagerly anticipating the eighth or ninth iteration. It had registered, that because they were going dotty, and did not remember telling it to me before... I could ask different questions. I could nod along and watch for which details *changed* from one version to the next. Those changes-- sometimes subtle and sometimes big enough to turn the whole significance of the story-- were like keys to understanding the whole person. The stories they'd carried into old age with them were the most important, the most emotionally resonant, the most formative things that had happened to them in a long life. They lay close to the heart. Sometimes they were told in a guarded fashion, sometimes for laughs, and sometimes an intermittent detail would lay the soul bare. It was mesmerizing.
But you have to get past a lot of boredom to get there. If you don't keep going, keep listening, you'll never hear the thing that changes, in the otherwise-stable matrix of the story. And it is much the same with many, many things. Be quiet, be still, keep watching, keep listening, and the world opens up.
By using deitary intervention, supplementation, you can "balance" the negative traits, while taking "advantage" of the positive traits, so they remain learning differently from others, but the "negative" aspects are more nuanced and easier to deal with.
So I think the curiosity and the distinct learning patterns remains but there may occur a shift in interest.
Funny you mention Il-10. It came under my radar this week as an attempt at an MRSA vaccine failed because the flippin' T cells insisted on damping down the inflammation havoc they were meant to seed:
Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Produced by Mutant Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 Vaccine-Induced Memory T Cells Downregulates IL-17 Production and Abrogates the Protective Effect against Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Sugar is the major ingredient of Covid19 jabs. Please let me know if you find further useful studies of injected versus swallowed Sucrose on Humans including Foetuses
Interesting topic, and it applies not just to children of course. When I was 19, I was walking down the street in the evening, and saw on the ground the streetlight shadow of a parking meter, the kind with 2 heads off a single pole. The shape of the shadow looked quite a bit like a mickey mouse head, with 2 big round ears. But someone had come along and spraypainted the sidewalk with the lower part of the Mickey Mouse head, so that the image was completed, but only when the streetlight was on. In the day, it just looked like an odd bit of paint on the sidewalk. At the moment, my brain could not quite parse what I was seeing, as I could not believe someone would be so cool as to create such a piece of art. I thought I was seeing....an impossible thing. What it did to my brain was a great lesson for me, on how some things just do not fit reality easily and it takes time to sort out what you are seeing.
There is a big difference between sucrose and glucose, though. Sucrose strongly affects calcium-to-phosphorus blood levels, while glucose does not so much (for healthy people). I suspect this is the reason that infant sugar exposure is especially problematic (not that it is harmless at any time).
Chronically elevated insulin also affects calcium-to-phosphorus, driving calcium into the cells, and I suspect this is the mechanism behind a lot of diabetic and pre-diabetic damage.
I'm being bombarded with multiple synthetic vitamins are bad article. Particularly against vitamin D/ cholecalciferol. Do you have any feedback on this? Total BS?
Different forms of vitamins act differently, some people with specific gene mutations will respond better, or sometimes ONLY respond to the "fancier" forms of said vitamins.
I have feedback on that bombarbement of "x is bad". The grift on other things is getting to hard, so gotta push a new one. =)
That comes from a substack guy who calls himself Agent131711. I don't know if he's actually an idiot or if he's just trying to be a shock-grifter, but I tried reading his vitamin D screed more than once and I had to put my rolling eyeballs in a sling by the time I read a few paragraphs. Just to give you an idea of how bogus his interpretations of things are, he helpfully gives you a link to "PROOF" that the US government is planning to kill us with synthetic vitamins: because a guy at NASA gave a lecture to defense industry professionals back in 2001 about possible future warfare scenarios.
It's always good to find out how the vitamin in question was produced. There are issues there, in the age old 'make waste into a sellable product'. Good Luck.
Very cool video - I didn't know that neurons actually create light when they fire.
I remember during 2020 that diabetics died from Covid much more frequently than healthy folks. The (purported) reason is that being obese leads to a very high demand for Thiamine, so diabetics tend to have low thiamine. Interestingly, the symptoms of beriberi actually look like some of the symptom picture for diabetics as well. Anyway, then C19 comes along and takes that level even lower, and the extra stress on the body causes damage or even fatality. Moriarty, have you come across this idea and if so, what do you think about it in light of the above articles?
On another point, I'd be interested on your take on a question I have been wrestling with. When does the intake of sugar or carbs become pathological (ie, even just suppressing the immune system)? There are a lot of arguments these days about diet types and what macro intakes are healthy. It seems that protein ends up about 15% of the diet, and fat should stay below 30%, say 25%, so as not to interfere with a clean burn of glucose in the mitochondria, and that all means that about 60% of the diet has to be carbs, the more active you are, the more carbs you need. I actually do feel better on that kind of a diet. I can eat carnivore for a little while but then I need carbs or things kind of go off the rails. Now, we do know that sugar tends to reduce immune strength temporarily (a few hours) and yet if/when I eat 60% carbs (including maple syrup/fruit), I almost never get sick (occasional covid hits but nothing else). That would seem to say that my intake of carbs is actually helping my immune system stay strong. Moriarty, given all of your research, how would you answer my question about carb intake and if there is a pathological pivot point, either absolute or, more likely, relative to the overall macro intake?
OK, Perry. I see what you mean in general, though it appears this technique still isn't up and running. Can you explain where the video Moriarty has put in his article comes from? Is it simply AI-generated? Or are you saying this Stanford project generated the video and assigned flashes to the neurons that expanded?
I don't know the source of the linked animation, but it is a visualization, an animation. I can guarantee you you won't see flashes of light if you cut open a monkey's skull and turn the lights out.
My favorite monkey-skull cutter-offer, by the way, is the neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn https://www.mccairndojo.com - he's a great guy who has also played an important helpful role in the community response to the plandemic.
Specifically on Sharma et al.:
I am quite innocent of mouse research and expected lab values. You note that there is capillary stalling dynamics from RBC factors and separate from inflammatory cells. In clinical work it would be expensive and unusual to be able to study Il-10. Historically an ESR measurement would indicate inflammatory burden as demonstrated by RBC "stickiness." Currently the favoured measure (particularly in the jurisdiction where this research was done) is CRP, or better hsCRP.
To extend the conclusions toward a useful clinical study I would have liked to see hsCRP as well as the detailed glucose and interleukin assays. I would expect the Il-10 measurements to be proportional to CRP, and thus give usefully accessible clinical information.
Following I would have wanted to see the same study run with a bit of Covid Spike protein- any bets on the outcome? The institution is an hour down the road, and I could almost guarantee that no funding for such a study would be available!
There is good research on the effects of DM on endothelial function and the Spike damage seems similar. I had been telling patients (especially diabetics) for at least thirty years that they lived on the lining of their blood vessels; this has been made very clear with the Covid and vaxx damage.
In your first review of the autistic characteristic, I have described the trait as "intellectual curiosity." Because of the structure and politics of ASD (and ADHD) diagnosis the eleven-dimensional Venn diagram makes it difficult to separate useful traits from deleterious conditions. I did not do well with my grade three teacher, if I had been 65 years younger I might have needed to have been drugged into submission!
Thanks, I appreciate your reviews and presentation of these articles which I would never encounter on my own.
Curiosity: that's really interesting! Have always had a dreadful time relating to incurious people. *How could you not want to KNOW??*
I have asked myself that same question millions of times. How a lot of people just don't want to know ? It is perplexing to me lol.
I learned a really fun thing in my adolescence. I had a lot of beloved older relatives who were perhaps on the first rung of senility. They didn't always remember my name. They told the same story over and over. I remember, almost to the day, when I turned the corner from clenching my teeth and tolerating the fifth retelling of some childhood story... to eagerly anticipating the eighth or ninth iteration. It had registered, that because they were going dotty, and did not remember telling it to me before... I could ask different questions. I could nod along and watch for which details *changed* from one version to the next. Those changes-- sometimes subtle and sometimes big enough to turn the whole significance of the story-- were like keys to understanding the whole person. The stories they'd carried into old age with them were the most important, the most emotionally resonant, the most formative things that had happened to them in a long life. They lay close to the heart. Sometimes they were told in a guarded fashion, sometimes for laughs, and sometimes an intermittent detail would lay the soul bare. It was mesmerizing.
But you have to get past a lot of boredom to get there. If you don't keep going, keep listening, you'll never hear the thing that changes, in the otherwise-stable matrix of the story. And it is much the same with many, many things. Be quiet, be still, keep watching, keep listening, and the world opens up.
Awesome AIDA, thank you very much for sharing
Freaky thoughts - if you achieve to moderate your autistic traits e.g. by using special diet, do you loose your focused curiosity?
Thanks as usual!
By using deitary intervention, supplementation, you can "balance" the negative traits, while taking "advantage" of the positive traits, so they remain learning differently from others, but the "negative" aspects are more nuanced and easier to deal with.
So I think the curiosity and the distinct learning patterns remains but there may occur a shift in interest.
Funny you mention Il-10. It came under my radar this week as an attempt at an MRSA vaccine failed because the flippin' T cells insisted on damping down the inflammation havoc they were meant to seed:
Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Produced by Mutant Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 Vaccine-Induced Memory T Cells Downregulates IL-17 Production and Abrogates the Protective Effect against Staphylococcus aureus Infection
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/iai.00494-19
Sugar is the major ingredient of Covid19 jabs. Please let me know if you find further useful studies of injected versus swallowed Sucrose on Humans including Foetuses
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/sugar-used-in-jabs-is-contaminated
I will if I find any =)
Interesting topic, and it applies not just to children of course. When I was 19, I was walking down the street in the evening, and saw on the ground the streetlight shadow of a parking meter, the kind with 2 heads off a single pole. The shape of the shadow looked quite a bit like a mickey mouse head, with 2 big round ears. But someone had come along and spraypainted the sidewalk with the lower part of the Mickey Mouse head, so that the image was completed, but only when the streetlight was on. In the day, it just looked like an odd bit of paint on the sidewalk. At the moment, my brain could not quite parse what I was seeing, as I could not believe someone would be so cool as to create such a piece of art. I thought I was seeing....an impossible thing. What it did to my brain was a great lesson for me, on how some things just do not fit reality easily and it takes time to sort out what you are seeing.
I hope you are on the DOGE 1% list already!
https://x.com/DOGE/status/1857076831104434289
The sugar study is fascinating, thanks!
There is a big difference between sucrose and glucose, though. Sucrose strongly affects calcium-to-phosphorus blood levels, while glucose does not so much (for healthy people). I suspect this is the reason that infant sugar exposure is especially problematic (not that it is harmless at any time).
Chronically elevated insulin also affects calcium-to-phosphorus, driving calcium into the cells, and I suspect this is the mechanism behind a lot of diabetic and pre-diabetic damage.
I'm being bombarded with multiple synthetic vitamins are bad article. Particularly against vitamin D/ cholecalciferol. Do you have any feedback on this? Total BS?
Different forms of vitamins act differently, some people with specific gene mutations will respond better, or sometimes ONLY respond to the "fancier" forms of said vitamins.
I have feedback on that bombarbement of "x is bad". The grift on other things is getting to hard, so gotta push a new one. =)
That comes from a substack guy who calls himself Agent131711. I don't know if he's actually an idiot or if he's just trying to be a shock-grifter, but I tried reading his vitamin D screed more than once and I had to put my rolling eyeballs in a sling by the time I read a few paragraphs. Just to give you an idea of how bogus his interpretations of things are, he helpfully gives you a link to "PROOF" that the US government is planning to kill us with synthetic vitamins: because a guy at NASA gave a lecture to defense industry professionals back in 2001 about possible future warfare scenarios.
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/chemtrails-chapter-9-in-2011-the
No wonder I found the author preemptively blocked lmao
It's always good to find out how the vitamin in question was produced. There are issues there, in the age old 'make waste into a sellable product'. Good Luck.
'Focus', 'Drive', 'Dedication', 'Persistence', 'Engagement' disappearing, with 'Autism' rising to describe these positive traits.
Is something being satanically inverted, then crosswired to appear to be insightful in the cited paper?
Very cool video - I didn't know that neurons actually create light when they fire.
I remember during 2020 that diabetics died from Covid much more frequently than healthy folks. The (purported) reason is that being obese leads to a very high demand for Thiamine, so diabetics tend to have low thiamine. Interestingly, the symptoms of beriberi actually look like some of the symptom picture for diabetics as well. Anyway, then C19 comes along and takes that level even lower, and the extra stress on the body causes damage or even fatality. Moriarty, have you come across this idea and if so, what do you think about it in light of the above articles?
On another point, I'd be interested on your take on a question I have been wrestling with. When does the intake of sugar or carbs become pathological (ie, even just suppressing the immune system)? There are a lot of arguments these days about diet types and what macro intakes are healthy. It seems that protein ends up about 15% of the diet, and fat should stay below 30%, say 25%, so as not to interfere with a clean burn of glucose in the mitochondria, and that all means that about 60% of the diet has to be carbs, the more active you are, the more carbs you need. I actually do feel better on that kind of a diet. I can eat carnivore for a little while but then I need carbs or things kind of go off the rails. Now, we do know that sugar tends to reduce immune strength temporarily (a few hours) and yet if/when I eat 60% carbs (including maple syrup/fruit), I almost never get sick (occasional covid hits but nothing else). That would seem to say that my intake of carbs is actually helping my immune system stay strong. Moriarty, given all of your research, how would you answer my question about carb intake and if there is a pathological pivot point, either absolute or, more likely, relative to the overall macro intake?
they are not emitting light, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2018/12/watching-brain-cells-fire-real-time
OK, Perry. I see what you mean in general, though it appears this technique still isn't up and running. Can you explain where the video Moriarty has put in his article comes from? Is it simply AI-generated? Or are you saying this Stanford project generated the video and assigned flashes to the neurons that expanded?
I don't know the source of the linked animation, but it is a visualization, an animation. I can guarantee you you won't see flashes of light if you cut open a monkey's skull and turn the lights out.
My favorite monkey-skull cutter-offer, by the way, is the neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn https://www.mccairndojo.com - he's a great guy who has also played an important helpful role in the community response to the plandemic.
Thanks, Perry. :-)