Talking about great changes coming to our way of life: Germany is setting up 'Wärmehallen', probably best translated as warming halls, with sleeping bags and blankets, for the coming winter. It's getting very real.
I saw it a few days ago, one big bank (Swiss I think) published a forecast that they expect Germans to burn wood to keep themselves warm.
It is going to get very real everywhere in the First World coming Winter. The US lags, but it is also in a fragile spot when it comes to energy. Too much disruptions going around.
When we talk about WEF and its agenda we have to mention imo Aurelio Peccei founder of the Club di Roma. He wrote The Limits to Growth (in progress reading it through) and WEF is very proud that in 1973 on the 3rd meeting he was the main speaker about this book.
About Harari: 2 years ago I read Sapiens but I haven't realised up to recently that this guy wrote it. The book was okay but many of his ideas I think are mainly generalisations and not very logical. Otherwise he comes through to me as a person who throw out wild ideas and able to convince people he is right. So a very good psychopath.
I will need to check it out. People often refer to Limits to Growth as work very inspired by Malthusian "thought", if we can call the asinine writings of Malthus "thought". I never looked to deep into the Club of Rome, but I do know they exert a fairly strong influence.
I think of Harari as a demon of satan or maybe the Antichrist himself. I would not equate Jordan Peterson with him. He is the exact opposite. Harari is Oligarchs astroturf, while Peterson is an academic psychologist and his populist appeal is organic. Oligarchs hate him with a passion bordering on obsession. Peterson is interested mostly in opposing leftist ideologies and helping people understand and overcome their suffering. Harari does not care about human suffering, except insofar as it advances his post-human “predictions” and enslaves us under the Oligarchs.
this guy klaus swab did it. how did he do it? amazing ... controlling the whole world, everyone goes to davos to get his marching orders from trudeau to macron, even trump's daughter former white house senior advisor ivanka ... too bad her mother died of these shots ...
Fascist technocrats allied with Malthusian Communists in a global Eugenicist Oligarchy at war with the middle class. Hopefully we can persuade them to leave us alone…
If I read this when you published it and only hit "like", forgive me. This is another extraordinary piece led here (I clicked every single hyperlink) :). The comments, particularly the follower who discusses Plato's cave, caused me to reacquaint myself with the story...it was a nice detour loaded with encouragement and affirmation! The process of coming out of the dark into the light can be a journey with lots of rocks on the path. Your work helps me, I am grateful to and for you.🙏
"But these beliefs don’t just happen in a vacuum, they are in fact old. They started with Kroptkin and his stupid seminal piece The Conquest of Bread, one of the main influences on Marx and Marxism. Elites often subscribe to such political ideologies out of strategy, not out of belief but means to an end, some people like Klaus actually believe, otherwise, he would not have a bust of Lenin inside his office."
The Conquest of Bread was not published until about the third volume of Das Kapital. Kropotkin was an anarchist, perhaps a socialist but by no means a communist or Marxist. The only people who hate anarchists as much as Capitalists, are Marxists. Marx despised Bakunin. Lenin is reported to have said, "If even a third of anarchists were like Peter Kropotkin, we Statists would all become anarchists."
I'm not clear why you think Kropotkin is the genesis for eugenics. A lot of nasty things have been said about Kropotkin, the vast majority untrue. But I have never heard anything quite as nasty as that about him. If you are going to make that claim I am going to ask you to say something more than it is stupid.
I claimed that the majority of the current beliefs of different sects of the elites and >modern< communist is born from Kropotkin and his stupid observations of "natural law". I should have made the distinction between old Marxist thought, new and current (which is a absolute mess).
Current form of communism is riddled with Kropotkin syntax and his "memes" (genes of culture).
I am talking about modern day dynamics and strategies used by ideological zealots and elites who influence the entire planet. I don't get attached to the semantics of who thought about what, because discussing philosophy and ideology will get us nowhere.
The current moving force of geopolitical order (ESG) is a mishmash of everything. It is a de novo ideology, and sticking to the past will not help anyone make sense, or fight back. Headless chickens all around.
This is what they did, I would know because in my previous life I dealt with these people, it is one of the reasons I self-imposed years of abject poverty upon myself, among other reasons.
Plus, if you dig around a little why I use the name John Paul, you will understand my perspective on politics and basically almost everything else in about 10 minutes.
There is no political solution. That sums up my perspective.
I have been assuming of late, the WEF and cohort are not marxist as much as they are an amalgam of everything that is worst about fascism and marxism.
But I suppose I am out of my depth. I am not well read enough to know to what degree Kropotkin is a forefather of the WEF, I just imagine he would be appalled by the abuse of power and his language.
No political solution? I would prefer one if we are going to remain a democracy.
"they are an amalgam of everything that is worst about fascism and marxism" That is correct, and my point, I don't think it is just these two ideologies. They are a mix of many facets of other ideologies, in my opinion.
You are not out of your depth and you are better read than I am. But to understand where I am coming from, you need to examine what I wrote from a memetic lens.
Interpret it more as genes being passed down on culture, and less like a intellectual pursuit of them, or anyone else. I think most thinkers, me agreeing with their work or not, would be appalled by the abuse.
In regards to the elites, I am extremist, I also favor deeply and mostly the Founding Fathers values, which are democratic, but you can guess which aspect of them I admire most.
Rebellion. Thank you for being patient with me =) hope you had a great weekend William. Appreciate your inputs.
You have definitely spurred me to read The Conquest of Bread, and do a critique on my substack. I do have a copy of it. And I only challenge you because I have admired how early you brought to my attention the issues around impending food shortages. That has much spurred my thinking of late.
"Headless chickens all around." - interesting that you use that metaphor. This reminds me of the imagery in my mind after listening to Yuri Bezmenov (no idea how legit he was, but what he tells is certainly visible) and then looking at current "academia". As if Soviet infiltration is still living forth there, gowing down the path of aggressive idiocy and societal destruction - hence headless chickens. Then again, such destruction might help to be able to "Build Back Better" later, so maybe it's not really that, but still being fueled. Allegedly, e.g. Soros funds that sort of "woke" ideology being propagated and pushed into everyones faces.
i wonder why there is such dislike for atheists out there especially in the US. we are not all Hitlers and Hararis, some of us are perfectly normal, whatever that is!
Because of Marxism, Progressivism, Rationalism. And of course, transhumanism.
Marxism and therefore progressivism only exist when there is a void of religious belief, it is hardcoded in their literature, to remove the belief of God is one of the first steps.
I don't care what people believe or not, but this is has been one of my longest observations, a lot of the more insanity prone ideological zealots follow a similar pattern. Fractured family, daddy issues, atheist, etc. This is the majority of them.
Let me rephrase, among the circles of high politicized, highly educated people dictating police, and effecting real world change, the atheist belief is predominant, meaning among them it is the majority of them. The same way not all Christians are pieces of shit because of their religion, atheists are not a scourge on the planet because their non-belief.
But the fact of the matter is that atheism is a tool for encroachment of certain divisive ideologies. The same way religious fanaticism will work in a similar way on the opposite side.
Too much of both will lead to massacres (just read about Franco and what communists did to people who followed religion).
I like everything in equilibrium, and believe in the American interpretation of freedom. I don't hate atheism, but I do hate a lot of atheists in the mainstream lol.
Ray, I have a soft spot as a former "atheistic agnostic." So called, because I didn't think it was any more logical to declare that a God/Source could not exist than to declare that it certainly did. But I was pretty sure it didn't and couldn't, lol.
That said, the pattern that emerged for me was that deep science always takes you to the same places. Into non-physical reality. And all the best innovators of the past knew this. And the Indigenous people knew/know, and still interact with it. And if you meet the right people, you will see that there are people walking about you with abilities that you can't understand unless you let go of scientific materialism. It has long since been the plan to replace religion (I mean that as a control system), with Science™. There is good science in the mainstream, but it can't get nearly where it needs to be, because the real science undermines pretty much everything we've scaffolded our world, cultures and industries around. Atheists are dangerous because if you can't see God in the world, you are capable of destroying things you were never capable of even understanding. But I agree, Atheists get a bad rap, since most probably just want to be left alone. And as far as I can tell most people in the US consider themselves Christians, and that hasn't stopped them from unleashing these terrible ideas, inventions and industries.
' Atheists are dangerous because if you can't see God in the world, you are capable of destroying things you were never capable of even understanding.'
i dont think atheists are more likely to be this way than a religious person, most of history is littered with religious hatred and war. all this hatred of outsiders is promoted by religion yet its rare to hear me hate on anyone (you have to have been very naughty)
hate is the enemy and religion plays into this time and again. believe what you want just dont drag my non beliefs into it
"But I agree, Atheists get a bad rap, since most probably just want to be left alone. And as far as I can tell most people in the US consider themselves Christians, and that hasn't stopped them from unleashing these terrible ideas, inventions and industries."
Sorry for the delay in replying to your message, I was in the procress of moving (and did everything by myself).
Harari, as such of people of his "ilk" for lack of a better term has that veneer of future sight and being aware of what the future holds, even though history serves as evidence that they always get almost everything wrong.
Thanks for delving into philanthropath-enablers like Harari and their historical origins.
I wrote a three-part series titled “Anatomy of a Philanthropath: Dreams of Democide & Dictatorship” with special focus on Harari in Parts 2 and 3:
• “Part 1: A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams)
• “Part 2: Downloadable Digital Dictatorships” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-947)
• “Part 3: Yuval Noah Harari: Not the Man We Think He Is?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-3fd)
This essay, written in preparation for my Corona Investigative Committee interview, also examines the depopulation agenda:
• “A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-mostly-peaceful-depopulation)
I will read them and will pin your comment too.
Thanks, John!
"Ideologies are like crippled religions." -Jordan Peterson
"Ideology, that is what gives the evildoing its long-sought justification
and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination."
-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Talking about great changes coming to our way of life: Germany is setting up 'Wärmehallen', probably best translated as warming halls, with sleeping bags and blankets, for the coming winter. It's getting very real.
I saw it a few days ago, one big bank (Swiss I think) published a forecast that they expect Germans to burn wood to keep themselves warm.
It is going to get very real everywhere in the First World coming Winter. The US lags, but it is also in a fragile spot when it comes to energy. Too much disruptions going around.
When we talk about WEF and its agenda we have to mention imo Aurelio Peccei founder of the Club di Roma. He wrote The Limits to Growth (in progress reading it through) and WEF is very proud that in 1973 on the 3rd meeting he was the main speaker about this book.
About Harari: 2 years ago I read Sapiens but I haven't realised up to recently that this guy wrote it. The book was okay but many of his ideas I think are mainly generalisations and not very logical. Otherwise he comes through to me as a person who throw out wild ideas and able to convince people he is right. So a very good psychopath.
I will need to check it out. People often refer to Limits to Growth as work very inspired by Malthusian "thought", if we can call the asinine writings of Malthus "thought". I never looked to deep into the Club of Rome, but I do know they exert a fairly strong influence.
I think of Harari as a demon of satan or maybe the Antichrist himself. I would not equate Jordan Peterson with him. He is the exact opposite. Harari is Oligarchs astroturf, while Peterson is an academic psychologist and his populist appeal is organic. Oligarchs hate him with a passion bordering on obsession. Peterson is interested mostly in opposing leftist ideologies and helping people understand and overcome their suffering. Harari does not care about human suffering, except insofar as it advances his post-human “predictions” and enslaves us under the Oligarchs.
That comment was made by the author of the second Harari article, not by me.
this guy klaus swab did it. how did he do it? amazing ... controlling the whole world, everyone goes to davos to get his marching orders from trudeau to macron, even trump's daughter former white house senior advisor ivanka ... too bad her mother died of these shots ...
Fascist technocrats allied with Malthusian Communists in a global Eugenicist Oligarchy at war with the middle class. Hopefully we can persuade them to leave us alone…
Awesome -
Very interesting to read the excerpts of that old post. Thank you!
If I read this when you published it and only hit "like", forgive me. This is another extraordinary piece led here (I clicked every single hyperlink) :). The comments, particularly the follower who discusses Plato's cave, caused me to reacquaint myself with the story...it was a nice detour loaded with encouragement and affirmation! The process of coming out of the dark into the light can be a journey with lots of rocks on the path. Your work helps me, I am grateful to and for you.🙏
Thank you for your kind words Jana.
That was amazing. Thank you so much for exploring this.
"But these beliefs don’t just happen in a vacuum, they are in fact old. They started with Kroptkin and his stupid seminal piece The Conquest of Bread, one of the main influences on Marx and Marxism. Elites often subscribe to such political ideologies out of strategy, not out of belief but means to an end, some people like Klaus actually believe, otherwise, he would not have a bust of Lenin inside his office."
The Conquest of Bread was not published until about the third volume of Das Kapital. Kropotkin was an anarchist, perhaps a socialist but by no means a communist or Marxist. The only people who hate anarchists as much as Capitalists, are Marxists. Marx despised Bakunin. Lenin is reported to have said, "If even a third of anarchists were like Peter Kropotkin, we Statists would all become anarchists."
I'm not clear why you think Kropotkin is the genesis for eugenics. A lot of nasty things have been said about Kropotkin, the vast majority untrue. But I have never heard anything quite as nasty as that about him. If you are going to make that claim I am going to ask you to say something more than it is stupid.
I wrote about anarchism recently: https://williamhunterduncan.substack.com/p/so-you-say-youre-an-anarchist
I claimed that the majority of the current beliefs of different sects of the elites and >modern< communist is born from Kropotkin and his stupid observations of "natural law". I should have made the distinction between old Marxist thought, new and current (which is a absolute mess).
Current form of communism is riddled with Kropotkin syntax and his "memes" (genes of culture).
I am talking about modern day dynamics and strategies used by ideological zealots and elites who influence the entire planet. I don't get attached to the semantics of who thought about what, because discussing philosophy and ideology will get us nowhere.
The current moving force of geopolitical order (ESG) is a mishmash of everything. It is a de novo ideology, and sticking to the past will not help anyone make sense, or fight back. Headless chickens all around.
This is what they did, I would know because in my previous life I dealt with these people, it is one of the reasons I self-imposed years of abject poverty upon myself, among other reasons.
Plus, if you dig around a little why I use the name John Paul, you will understand my perspective on politics and basically almost everything else in about 10 minutes.
There is no political solution. That sums up my perspective.
I have been assuming of late, the WEF and cohort are not marxist as much as they are an amalgam of everything that is worst about fascism and marxism.
But I suppose I am out of my depth. I am not well read enough to know to what degree Kropotkin is a forefather of the WEF, I just imagine he would be appalled by the abuse of power and his language.
No political solution? I would prefer one if we are going to remain a democracy.
"they are an amalgam of everything that is worst about fascism and marxism" That is correct, and my point, I don't think it is just these two ideologies. They are a mix of many facets of other ideologies, in my opinion.
You are not out of your depth and you are better read than I am. But to understand where I am coming from, you need to examine what I wrote from a memetic lens.
Interpret it more as genes being passed down on culture, and less like a intellectual pursuit of them, or anyone else. I think most thinkers, me agreeing with their work or not, would be appalled by the abuse.
In regards to the elites, I am extremist, I also favor deeply and mostly the Founding Fathers values, which are democratic, but you can guess which aspect of them I admire most.
Rebellion. Thank you for being patient with me =) hope you had a great weekend William. Appreciate your inputs.
You have definitely spurred me to read The Conquest of Bread, and do a critique on my substack. I do have a copy of it. And I only challenge you because I have admired how early you brought to my attention the issues around impending food shortages. That has much spurred my thinking of late.
"Headless chickens all around." - interesting that you use that metaphor. This reminds me of the imagery in my mind after listening to Yuri Bezmenov (no idea how legit he was, but what he tells is certainly visible) and then looking at current "academia". As if Soviet infiltration is still living forth there, gowing down the path of aggressive idiocy and societal destruction - hence headless chickens. Then again, such destruction might help to be able to "Build Back Better" later, so maybe it's not really that, but still being fueled. Allegedly, e.g. Soros funds that sort of "woke" ideology being propagated and pushed into everyones faces.
If not a political solution, then what do you think is most expediently effective and necessary now?
i wonder why there is such dislike for atheists out there especially in the US. we are not all Hitlers and Hararis, some of us are perfectly normal, whatever that is!
Because of Marxism, Progressivism, Rationalism. And of course, transhumanism.
Marxism and therefore progressivism only exist when there is a void of religious belief, it is hardcoded in their literature, to remove the belief of God is one of the first steps.
I don't care what people believe or not, but this is has been one of my longest observations, a lot of the more insanity prone ideological zealots follow a similar pattern. Fractured family, daddy issues, atheist, etc. This is the majority of them.
you need to visit the uk, this is not the majority of us
Let me rephrase, among the circles of high politicized, highly educated people dictating police, and effecting real world change, the atheist belief is predominant, meaning among them it is the majority of them. The same way not all Christians are pieces of shit because of their religion, atheists are not a scourge on the planet because their non-belief.
But the fact of the matter is that atheism is a tool for encroachment of certain divisive ideologies. The same way religious fanaticism will work in a similar way on the opposite side.
Too much of both will lead to massacres (just read about Franco and what communists did to people who followed religion).
I like everything in equilibrium, and believe in the American interpretation of freedom. I don't hate atheism, but I do hate a lot of atheists in the mainstream lol.
Ray, I have a soft spot as a former "atheistic agnostic." So called, because I didn't think it was any more logical to declare that a God/Source could not exist than to declare that it certainly did. But I was pretty sure it didn't and couldn't, lol.
That said, the pattern that emerged for me was that deep science always takes you to the same places. Into non-physical reality. And all the best innovators of the past knew this. And the Indigenous people knew/know, and still interact with it. And if you meet the right people, you will see that there are people walking about you with abilities that you can't understand unless you let go of scientific materialism. It has long since been the plan to replace religion (I mean that as a control system), with Science™. There is good science in the mainstream, but it can't get nearly where it needs to be, because the real science undermines pretty much everything we've scaffolded our world, cultures and industries around. Atheists are dangerous because if you can't see God in the world, you are capable of destroying things you were never capable of even understanding. But I agree, Atheists get a bad rap, since most probably just want to be left alone. And as far as I can tell most people in the US consider themselves Christians, and that hasn't stopped them from unleashing these terrible ideas, inventions and industries.
' Atheists are dangerous because if you can't see God in the world, you are capable of destroying things you were never capable of even understanding.'
i dont think atheists are more likely to be this way than a religious person, most of history is littered with religious hatred and war. all this hatred of outsiders is promoted by religion yet its rare to hear me hate on anyone (you have to have been very naughty)
hate is the enemy and religion plays into this time and again. believe what you want just dont drag my non beliefs into it
"But I agree, Atheists get a bad rap, since most probably just want to be left alone. And as far as I can tell most people in the US consider themselves Christians, and that hasn't stopped them from unleashing these terrible ideas, inventions and industries."
Maybe you missed that part :)
what if we just ignore them? will they go away?
I am afraid they won't left us alone, regardless of what we do, besides actually fighting back. No other way around with these people.
They never learn, they ignore parts of history they don't like.
Busybodies never just go away. Much less some with an obsession, such as thinking you are wasting _their_ (and their offspring's) prescious resources.
Sorry for the delay in replying to your message, I was in the procress of moving (and did everything by myself).
Harari, as such of people of his "ilk" for lack of a better term has that veneer of future sight and being aware of what the future holds, even though history serves as evidence that they always get almost everything wrong.