I dont quite follow Edwin - do you mean that some cohort researched into aids years ago-and used that research to add the gp120 HIV inserts into sars cov 2(among other inserts)-and its causing low grade degradation of immune systems? At least that would line up with what Igor Chudov and Montagnier say. Can you explain it clearer?
they study what makes these viruses pathogenic, then they look for other viruses they can add pathogenic portions to, that will allow them to achieve other goals, like infectivity, cloaking from the immune system, etc. Then they Frankenstein them up, and they either get out accidentally or on purpose.
Based on the billions these folks have just made, can't you imagine any incentive that would keep then from releasing something that would make you unimaginably wealthy with no liability?
Assuming both virus and cure are toxic.... youd invariably kill or disable several of your family members if not yourself in a global outbreak. Also-I cant imagine they all take saline jabs for themselves on camera, that info would leak out eventually.
Yes. Dr. Fauci learned a lot in 43 years of studying AIDS. Of course he never mentions the experimental Hepatitis vaccine in 1978, given to ONLY homosexuals, or what became of those who got that shot from NY to San Francisco, but ED Hooper tells you the rest of the sorry story in his 1000 page book, which I have read many times. Even then I could only think of the word evil to describe it, but now I must find new words to describe giving an experimental mRNA vaccine to a pregnant mother. Lisa Marie Presley died today at just 54 and Jeff Best. This is all a crazy nightmare which we somehow have to deal with and fight for our future.
May I suggest the reverse: you do all your work on Substack and post Sub links to the bird and other platforms. After all, the bird is meant for short comments, pics, and links.
I do both. Not using Twitter is a detriment to scientific research, or any type of research. The amount of information and the velocity is incomparable. A few papers only came to my attention because of Twitter.
If you know how to use Twitter, it is an amazing tool. If I did all my work here, not only my reach would fall by a colossal amount, but I would send too many e-mails everyday. I already don't like sending two lol.
It is not just volume. I do a lot of research so I connect dots others don't, this is why I usually am ahead, even of people who are far far more knowledgeable than I am. Also things keep happening LOL.
It is a catch-22. If the relevant content providers migrated, then the bird would definitely change its feathers.
Have an anonymous account where you only follow and don't comment/like. That is how, so far, I've managed to keep under its radar. Occasionally I "liked" its promo tweets to keep it sweet.
"By guile shall ye wage battles"
Alas, most of "us" are not playing at "their" levels.
Social impact bonds tend to be risky investments, as they are entirely dependent upon the success of the social outcome. Unlike normal bonds, social impact bonds are not affected by variables such as interest rate risk, reinvestment risk, or market risk. However, they are still subject to default and inflation risk. It can be hard to determine the success of social impact bonds, as they are based on social impact, which is often harder to quantify and measure. There are many more variables than regular bonds, which are comparatively easy to measure because they are based on hard data. For this reason, it's hard for social impact bonds to get government funding
JP - can you or have you done research on the Social Bond & finance?
“Social Bonds are use of proceeds bonds that raise funds for new and existing projects that address or mitigate a specific social issue and/or seek to achieve positive social outcomes.”
Huge Thank you!
Those BASTARDS, and they knew all the time!
Like I said before, John Paul, at least all that AIDS research didn't go to waste, and no they weren't trying to cure a lifestyle, but weaponize it!
I was wrong then, and I freely admit it now. This is so much worse than we could have even conceived decade(s) ago.
Those motherf-ckers and yes, the GULAG would be too good for them.
Damn them, damn them all to hell.
Fantastic job, sir, really outstanding!
I dont quite follow Edwin - do you mean that some cohort researched into aids years ago-and used that research to add the gp120 HIV inserts into sars cov 2(among other inserts)-and its causing low grade degradation of immune systems? At least that would line up with what Igor Chudov and Montagnier say. Can you explain it clearer?
Yes, the "weaponization" of the data was the point!
RFK's examination of Fauci shows he was never a physician, just a witch doctor.
It is like this gain of function research, never has it helped a single individual but they still spend billions on it every day!
When modern medicine takes a back seat to biowarfare research, well, we have arrived haven't we?
now im even more lost!haha
I dont understand weaponisation of the data.weaponisation of a virus I can understand.maybe my brain is too literal.sorry.
they study what makes these viruses pathogenic, then they look for other viruses they can add pathogenic portions to, that will allow them to achieve other goals, like infectivity, cloaking from the immune system, etc. Then they Frankenstein them up, and they either get out accidentally or on purpose.
Based on the billions these folks have just made, can't you imagine any incentive that would keep then from releasing something that would make you unimaginably wealthy with no liability?
But youd have to be evil to do that.
Assuming both virus and cure are toxic.... youd invariably kill or disable several of your family members if not yourself in a global outbreak. Also-I cant imagine they all take saline jabs for themselves on camera, that info would leak out eventually.
Yes. Dr. Fauci learned a lot in 43 years of studying AIDS. Of course he never mentions the experimental Hepatitis vaccine in 1978, given to ONLY homosexuals, or what became of those who got that shot from NY to San Francisco, but ED Hooper tells you the rest of the sorry story in his 1000 page book, which I have read many times. Even then I could only think of the word evil to describe it, but now I must find new words to describe giving an experimental mRNA vaccine to a pregnant mother. Lisa Marie Presley died today at just 54 and Jeff Best. This is all a crazy nightmare which we somehow have to deal with and fight for our future.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qOdhKCoILgg
Thanks.
May I suggest the reverse: you do all your work on Substack and post Sub links to the bird and other platforms. After all, the bird is meant for short comments, pics, and links.
I do both. Not using Twitter is a detriment to scientific research, or any type of research. The amount of information and the velocity is incomparable. A few papers only came to my attention because of Twitter.
If you know how to use Twitter, it is an amazing tool. If I did all my work here, not only my reach would fall by a colossal amount, but I would send too many e-mails everyday. I already don't like sending two lol.
Sen them John, send them.
This is far too important to be constrained by simple volume limitations.
It is not just volume. I do a lot of research so I connect dots others don't, this is why I usually am ahead, even of people who are far far more knowledgeable than I am. Also things keep happening LOL.
It is a catch-22. If the relevant content providers migrated, then the bird would definitely change its feathers.
Have an anonymous account where you only follow and don't comment/like. That is how, so far, I've managed to keep under its radar. Occasionally I "liked" its promo tweets to keep it sweet.
"By guile shall ye wage battles"
Alas, most of "us" are not playing at "their" levels.
Excellent paper 👍👍
Video about
SMART Contracts for Enforced Behavior
They have a big DNA plan.... and you’re it!
We are being ‘thingy-fied’ or commodified.
You’ll be set on a pathway (continuum of care) to constant self-improvement.
Micro work credits
Reduce life to a software dashboard
Will all happen in Meta/ Virtual space, so the livestock live & act in the virtual world, our rulers will live in ‘God’s natural’ world!
Eyes wide-open, eh?
Goldman Sachs social impact bonds
1. They need to change you i to data
2. Make a prediction how you will behave
3. They nudge you for appropriate behaviour
4. That’s the impact
5. Changes are measured before & after
It’s happening now chaps - pay attention to it
Understanding Social Impact Bonds (SIBs)
Social impact bonds tend to be risky investments, as they are entirely dependent upon the success of the social outcome. Unlike normal bonds, social impact bonds are not affected by variables such as interest rate risk, reinvestment risk, or market risk. However, they are still subject to default and inflation risk. It can be hard to determine the success of social impact bonds, as they are based on social impact, which is often harder to quantify and measure. There are many more variables than regular bonds, which are comparatively easy to measure because they are based on hard data. For this reason, it's hard for social impact bonds to get government funding
Social Impact Bonds
Poverty will be managed as a global impact market.
Pay for success finance. To securitise us.
Impact Securities - free market in humanity
The game is a militarised game. Value created in the game
Your digital self will be on blockchain
They need:
A simulated/ augmented reality
A profile & ID for you
JP - can you or have you done research on the Social Bond & finance?
“Social Bonds are use of proceeds bonds that raise funds for new and existing projects that address or mitigate a specific social issue and/or seek to achieve positive social outcomes.”
... and it’s implications
Eg packaged humans ( livestock)
Virtualising life as a profit center