I am trying to find middle ground between science heavy, and adding easier to understand content. It isn't simpler I think, I just made a (big) conscious effort to make it more understandable. Glad it is working, wasn't sure. And you are welcome.
Wifey finally had covid at Xmas and hasnt been fully better since. SHe has had a rash on her bullybutton that antibiotics get rid of for like 2 days but then its back.
She finally got a swab from doctor and it just came back as CULTURE ++ Staphylococcus aureus +
Scanty'Streptococcus species.
Fungal infection I think.
My problem is She wont take your vitamins or fast, she thinks theyre unhealthy and put a tax on your liver etc.(she has Latent Hep B and active TB 4 years ago)
You called it JP - the fungal infections and lowered immune systems!
NAC is literally used to clean the liver, it can help treating latent TB among many other things. That is a persistent fungal infection it is annoying to get rid of Aureus.
The fungal infection is clearly tilting her immune system into Th2 (allergy mode). Antibiotics are a double edge sword, bombs away.
I take no smug happiness from being right anymore 😭
Unfortunately yes.2. Active TB 4 yrs ago left some lung scarring and dormant hep b too. Is the fasting and supplements protocol the only choice or does anyone have a topical ointment to recommend?topical and oral antibiotics werent mych good so far.
Fungal infections need to be dealt with as the medical care provider sees fit but unless she takes the supplement to recover proper immune function, it will be a rollercoaster of infection>latency>infection resurfacing>latency
Did you inadvertently leave out a "not"? “although this strategy might be practical in the real world due to safety concerns”. would make a lot more sense as “although this strategy might NOT be practical in the real world due to safety concerns”.
A direct quote from the paper. A literal copy and paste, authors left the not out, and so did I. They may issue a correction on that pretty soon. Perhaps I should have added the not but then it wouldn't be a direct quote.
Thanks for this article. I found it easier to read too, not sure if you attempted to make your writing more simple or understandable...
Thanks for bringing to our attention the cost of multiple infections.
I am trying to find middle ground between science heavy, and adding easier to understand content. It isn't simpler I think, I just made a (big) conscious effort to make it more understandable. Glad it is working, wasn't sure. And you are welcome.
Wifey finally had covid at Xmas and hasnt been fully better since. SHe has had a rash on her bullybutton that antibiotics get rid of for like 2 days but then its back.
She finally got a swab from doctor and it just came back as CULTURE ++ Staphylococcus aureus +
Scanty'Streptococcus species.
Fungal infection I think.
My problem is She wont take your vitamins or fast, she thinks theyre unhealthy and put a tax on your liver etc.(she has Latent Hep B and active TB 4 years ago)
You called it JP - the fungal infections and lowered immune systems!
NAC is literally used to clean the liver, it can help treating latent TB among many other things. That is a persistent fungal infection it is annoying to get rid of Aureus.
The fungal infection is clearly tilting her immune system into Th2 (allergy mode). Antibiotics are a double edge sword, bombs away.
I take no smug happiness from being right anymore 😭
Is she quakcinated?
Unfortunately yes.2. Active TB 4 yrs ago left some lung scarring and dormant hep b too. Is the fasting and supplements protocol the only choice or does anyone have a topical ointment to recommend?topical and oral antibiotics werent mych good so far.
Fungal infections need to be dealt with as the medical care provider sees fit but unless she takes the supplement to recover proper immune function, it will be a rollercoaster of infection>latency>infection resurfacing>latency
Did you inadvertently leave out a "not"? “although this strategy might be practical in the real world due to safety concerns”. would make a lot more sense as “although this strategy might NOT be practical in the real world due to safety concerns”.
A direct quote from the paper. A literal copy and paste, authors left the not out, and so did I. They may issue a correction on that pretty soon. Perhaps I should have added the not but then it wouldn't be a direct quote.