This quicker post will serve many purposes, and it will tie a lot of the work we have been doing for the most part of 2021 forwards into perspective, and give hard proof.
New study finds organ recipients rejecting transplant after receiving COVID vaccine
Some transplant recipients are rejecting their new organ and scientists say the coronavirus vaccine may be to blame.
According to a new study published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, acute corneal allografts are being rejected by immunized patients who’ve undergone the procedure. Researchers say the underlying cause could be tied to a systemic inflammatory response elicited by the shot post-jab.
The cornea is the outermost layer of a person’s eye. Corneal grafts are used to restore a damaged cornea. The surgery is known to be one of the most successful organ transplant procedures with low rejection rates. It restores vision, reduces eye pain and improves the appearance of the diseased cornea.
Japanese researchers compiled data from 23 studies. A total of 23 eyes from 21 patients who had undergone corneal graft procedures were assessed. Graft rejection occurred anywhere from one day to six weeks after vaccination in all patients–some who underwent the procedure as far back as twenty years ago.
“As the virus continues to spread, additional booster COVID-19 vaccines are expected,” study authors wrote in the paper. “Therefore, proper follow-up of corneal allograft recipients and interventions to prevent corneal allograft rejection after they received the COVID-19 may be crucial.”
Among the list of emerging complications linked to the vaccine are blood clots, heart inflammation and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
It doesn’t take long to add more “to the pile” in this matter, there are published cases of transplant (other times referred to as graft) rejection after vaccination. The point being this should be no surprise for any follower from mid-2021 onwards. In fact, it ties well into a lot of what we covered recently.
Incidentally, this paper was published at some point yesterday, and the continuous flood of evidence proving our observations and hypothesis correct continues, at this point, I think it would be fair enough to call it a “theory” and not a hypothesis.
This is further evidence to the points brought forth by my last piece, one earlier about Th17 responses from the vaccines and the entire hypothesis itself, to further understand the significance of the Th17, Part IV which is pinned on the opening page of this Substack would be a good starting point, I might make an entire post talking about Th17 itself and all the different pathologies it can help to progress.
The paper on cancer patients above also further proves some of my other observations, in specific the one about the poor CD8 immune response in most vaccinated people, a response presents mostly in unvaccinated, and sometimes in some of the previous infected+vaccinated, the immune response that actually helps clear the virus. To not over-complicate an already severely complex topic, this also shed some light on the recent changes in B-cell response that I wrote about and the shift in antibody (IgG) response in many of the vaccinated months after the fact.
If you were vaccinated and followed anything in my Things Hidden series, this means you are most likely “safe” from all the pathologies the Th17 can/will set off.
I can now put to bed any further doubts if I was on the right track, despite the doubts of almost every scientist, expert, and anything in between besides the person who I collaborated with.
A chance no post comes tomorrow or another short one, I need to work on the deindustrialization one, and especially the one about a specific protein. Perhaps a short one about the mimicry, which falls down on all of this.
I wish you a nice afternoon/evening.
Organ rejection after vaccine, Further evidence on the Th17
Remember when people were getting removed from transplant waiting lists because they declined the jabs?
In the last part of that study it suggests that if the MRNA could address inflammation reaction they could be more effective. I’m not sure that we should be injecting ourselves with the spike in the first place, let alone use MRNA which seems to be poorly understood. I see Denmark is no longer offering boosters to under 50.. they must have seen safety signals. Highly concerning that patients are rejecting organs especially all of them in this study. It’s seems that they say all with prior Covid & vaccinated, so can we separate into applies to vaccines only? Either way I think the Pandora’s box has been flung opened & the majority are now in a much worse position. We should be furious.