I have thought for a while now that they are spraying mould spores into the air, it interferes with the nervous system and that affects the immune system. And 5G increases the speed at which mould multiplies.
If they want or are trying to increase respiratory ailments it certainly seems a plausible way to do it. Just anecdotally even a non scientist knows that mold spores can survive almost anything and it always seems like if you get fungal pneumonia (as in AIDS for example) it is nearly last rights time because funguses just seem to be nasty and can survive dam near anything once they take hold. I often think about "famer's lung" and how it comes from breathing dirt dust spewed up by plowing. We are surrounded by mold but we just are not designed to be breathing it. You can dig in your garden all you want and will probably be better for doing it but no one thinks it is a good idea to breath dried micro fine dirt because once that mold gets in you bad things happen. You have a better chance with bacteria but mold is nasty and hard to lose
Because of the recent tragedy in Texas there has been lots of news in substack and elsewhere about cloud seeding and geo & weather engineering in general. Got me to wondering about what happens when all that silver iodide used to seed clouds drifts to earth (and our lungs). Who knows what other "none of your business" substances we are inundating the earth with as a side effect of industry (innocent enough) but also as a side effect of attempts to play God when they climate engineer and cloud seed. Silver and I presume silver iodide is a powerful anti-bacteria agent. They use it in ceramic water filters for example to control bacterial overgrowth. Got me to wondering what all that silver iodide does to the soil bacteria balance when we recklessly spray it everywhere. Perhaps it does nothing but it is no perhaps that we don't know.
Playing God is a hubristic and dangerous past time but it goes on all the time.. TOO MANY VARIABLES and we are not God. When they seed clouds en masse they really don't know for sure what may result. Seems fair to speculate that if one area gets extra rain (perhaps too much) another area that used to get rain now gets less. You may get a little rain or you may get what happened in Dubai.
People as we speak are wondering about the Texas flood. Those are the things we see and wonder about. There are also the things we don't see and don't even know to think about, like what happens to the soil and air from silver iodide? Whether it is "benign" well intentioned modern farming or the hubris of climate engineering we really need to consider what we are doing. PARTICULARLY what we are doing to things we don't know about or may not have considered, like as you mention, healthy soil bacteria.
There is no such thing as well intentioned modern farming. Farmers have been forced into farming this way by numerous ways just like they are now in India, if the farmers don't give up the old traditional way of farming for the "well intentioned modern farming" they are told their crops won't be bought so they tried to stick it out but a lot of them committed suicide due to huge debts they could never come back from.
The old way looked after the land by not over cultivating it and this is so important that farmers prefer a smaller yield over a longer period.
Decades ago farmers around the world were paid a lot of money to not cultivate the land and that gave "them" the excuse of using GMO because "there wasn't enough food to feed the world" - absolute bollox - so they were then able to spray a ton of pesticides on the food that not only carcinogenic but it also killed off our good gut bacteria. The good bacteria helps us to digest our food among other things but they also help our immune system to function properly. Are you seeing a pattern yet?
When I used "well intentioned" I was just trying to differentiate between some farmer wanting to plough his field to get some crops and some guy trying to control the weather. The latter I see as playing God. The former I see, at least at the individual level as someone just trying to farm as he's been taught or is able to do. .. But I see your point and agree with you.
I'm not a ag expert but my introduction to the GMO scam was reading about "golden rice" which was supposed to solve the lack of vitamin A (carotenoids) problem for rice dependent cultures like India. What could be wrong with that? They had a Beri Beri problem or something. Was perhaps a decade or two before I understood that the "golden rice" virtue marketing for GMO was just cover for the real reason for GMO's, resistance to pesticides and weed killers like glyphosate.so they could inundate us with such poisons and eventually make us dependent without extreme effort to reverse course. Now we hear "if we stop the poison dependence we'll all starve". I have no idea if that is true but am sure it is true that many things that start out looking like virtue turn out to be ways to herd us in to dependence.
At this point playing God with nature is totally out of control. With mRNA they trying to make ALL of us GMO. And just like conventional ag GMO they are selling it as a way to cure cancer when in fact it is trying to play God and setting us up for more unnecessary dependence that could be avoided if we tried to work with nature.. Genetically modifying all humanity is quite a step to take to mitigate a fake pandemic. Especially considering that they know the lethal dangers of mRNA. Soon enough ALL of us may be spike protein factories dependent on Nattokinase supplements (or similar) brought to you by Pfizer to mitigate the problem of clotting from the spike proteins (probably GMO Nattokinase to boost production). The promise of mRNA to fix cancer may even include the cancers caused by mRNA. That's marketing synergy on steroids. As you say, no such thing as well-intentioned when it comes to a lot of these programs.
Here's just one of many clips that can be found about what goes on with impunity behind our backs. No one is considering the consequence and potentially disastrous side effects of such things.
I just ordered (Chlor ine Diox ide) kit (put the C and D word together-highly suppressed info) from Amazon. To my knowledge JP has never recommended CD l, so we’ll see what he replies. 😊 this is his space, I respect that.
Well, YIKES! What about climate meddlers spraying the tiny “mirrors” into clouds to deflect the sun and thus cool the atmosphere (and stunt growing seasons! What dumb idea will they come up with next?) Could that carry viruses?
Depending on the chemical structure of the particles, some may carry toxins, while others don't. However, most microparticles sprayed into the atmosphere, if carried down to our city's level and beyond, will cause airway irritation, resulting in allergic reactions.
Moriarty, what do you mean by "gene delivery system"? Are you talking about a mechanism to explain shedding reports? Something that can carry mRNA or spikes to other people? Or gene retrotranscription into DNA? Or something else I'm not following? Are you saying that people release fungal spores that can carry other material? If a woman has a yeast infection and gets vaxxxed, might she "shed" fungal spores with spike on them, causing problems for nearby women who might have fungal problems of their own and be more susceptible?
It means that by manipulating and using HMGB1 to cause a sordid post-translation modification (adding things after the protein is produced, in this case, the viral Spike) the virus can use HMGB1 to deliver itself into core parts of the cell machinery and yes, in "insert itself".
Although so far the evidence points towards more transient epigenetic changes, rather than retroviral-style (HIV).
I am saying a virus does what an injection does, thus, we are merely more apt to defend ourselves from it.
No, sorry for the confusion, but even someone infected with Candida Auris wouldn't "shed" spores with Spike. But I 100% believe fungal colonies and otherwise skin conditions caused by yeast are harboring Spike fragments.
On the GDS, ok, I think I get it. Maybe I need to review your best article for discussing HMGB1, if you could provide me a link. That critter just keeps coming up again and again. Otherwise, I may search and see what I can find.
On the yeast question, people do breathe out fungi and other critters every time they breathe. Note the diseases cultured on a surgical mask after a couple hours. If fungi breathed out are capable of harboring spike proteins, why would that not be a possible way to "shed" the spike to others, or then again perhaps to communicate it skin-to-skin or during sex? It just seems to me that you can't say that yeast colonies can harbor spike proteins and not consider the avenues for communicating themselves to others, for those avenues surely exist, do they not? Where am I going wrong here in my thinking?
"...as yeast and fungi are annoyingly persistent."
Fungus, yeast, basically almost all microorganisms are affected (as are we, since we are comprised of them as a halobiome) by low level electromagnetic radiation.😐
Most will proliferate under low EMR as it acts as a hormetic, adaptive function. So teasing apart what is an effect of LL-EMR and what is a direct effect of Spike/LNP will be difficult. There's no data even on poorer outcomes of hospitalused COVID comparing exposure rates to environmental LL-EMR, because it's not convenient to narrative in any way, shape, or form and because most dismiss the concept as conspiracy. Ironic as hospitals antimicrobial resistance issues are legendary in certain circles, and also very high in EMR There's quite a lot of different solutions/therapeutics to the virus/spike, it appears to actually be not particularly dangerous in itself, but when the spike is combined with environmental EMR, we get a very different picture, particularly in susceptible populations.😐
The real danger from spikopathies is in its persistence, which again, I think if tested in an EMR free environment would be very different.
I look forward to reading the continuation of this series.🙏
I have thought for a while now that they are spraying mould spores into the air, it interferes with the nervous system and that affects the immune system. And 5G increases the speed at which mould multiplies.
If they want or are trying to increase respiratory ailments it certainly seems a plausible way to do it. Just anecdotally even a non scientist knows that mold spores can survive almost anything and it always seems like if you get fungal pneumonia (as in AIDS for example) it is nearly last rights time because funguses just seem to be nasty and can survive dam near anything once they take hold. I often think about "famer's lung" and how it comes from breathing dirt dust spewed up by plowing. We are surrounded by mold but we just are not designed to be breathing it. You can dig in your garden all you want and will probably be better for doing it but no one thinks it is a good idea to breath dried micro fine dirt because once that mold gets in you bad things happen. You have a better chance with bacteria but mold is nasty and hard to lose
Current farming methods destrpy the healthy soil bacteria leading to mold overgrowth.
Because of the recent tragedy in Texas there has been lots of news in substack and elsewhere about cloud seeding and geo & weather engineering in general. Got me to wondering about what happens when all that silver iodide used to seed clouds drifts to earth (and our lungs). Who knows what other "none of your business" substances we are inundating the earth with as a side effect of industry (innocent enough) but also as a side effect of attempts to play God when they climate engineer and cloud seed. Silver and I presume silver iodide is a powerful anti-bacteria agent. They use it in ceramic water filters for example to control bacterial overgrowth. Got me to wondering what all that silver iodide does to the soil bacteria balance when we recklessly spray it everywhere. Perhaps it does nothing but it is no perhaps that we don't know.
Playing God is a hubristic and dangerous past time but it goes on all the time.. TOO MANY VARIABLES and we are not God. When they seed clouds en masse they really don't know for sure what may result. Seems fair to speculate that if one area gets extra rain (perhaps too much) another area that used to get rain now gets less. You may get a little rain or you may get what happened in Dubai.
People as we speak are wondering about the Texas flood. Those are the things we see and wonder about. There are also the things we don't see and don't even know to think about, like what happens to the soil and air from silver iodide? Whether it is "benign" well intentioned modern farming or the hubris of climate engineering we really need to consider what we are doing. PARTICULARLY what we are doing to things we don't know about or may not have considered, like as you mention, healthy soil bacteria.
There is no such thing as well intentioned modern farming. Farmers have been forced into farming this way by numerous ways just like they are now in India, if the farmers don't give up the old traditional way of farming for the "well intentioned modern farming" they are told their crops won't be bought so they tried to stick it out but a lot of them committed suicide due to huge debts they could never come back from.
The old way looked after the land by not over cultivating it and this is so important that farmers prefer a smaller yield over a longer period.
Decades ago farmers around the world were paid a lot of money to not cultivate the land and that gave "them" the excuse of using GMO because "there wasn't enough food to feed the world" - absolute bollox - so they were then able to spray a ton of pesticides on the food that not only carcinogenic but it also killed off our good gut bacteria. The good bacteria helps us to digest our food among other things but they also help our immune system to function properly. Are you seeing a pattern yet?
When I used "well intentioned" I was just trying to differentiate between some farmer wanting to plough his field to get some crops and some guy trying to control the weather. The latter I see as playing God. The former I see, at least at the individual level as someone just trying to farm as he's been taught or is able to do. .. But I see your point and agree with you.
I'm not a ag expert but my introduction to the GMO scam was reading about "golden rice" which was supposed to solve the lack of vitamin A (carotenoids) problem for rice dependent cultures like India. What could be wrong with that? They had a Beri Beri problem or something. Was perhaps a decade or two before I understood that the "golden rice" virtue marketing for GMO was just cover for the real reason for GMO's, resistance to pesticides and weed killers like glyphosate.so they could inundate us with such poisons and eventually make us dependent without extreme effort to reverse course. Now we hear "if we stop the poison dependence we'll all starve". I have no idea if that is true but am sure it is true that many things that start out looking like virtue turn out to be ways to herd us in to dependence.
At this point playing God with nature is totally out of control. With mRNA they trying to make ALL of us GMO. And just like conventional ag GMO they are selling it as a way to cure cancer when in fact it is trying to play God and setting us up for more unnecessary dependence that could be avoided if we tried to work with nature.. Genetically modifying all humanity is quite a step to take to mitigate a fake pandemic. Especially considering that they know the lethal dangers of mRNA. Soon enough ALL of us may be spike protein factories dependent on Nattokinase supplements (or similar) brought to you by Pfizer to mitigate the problem of clotting from the spike proteins (probably GMO Nattokinase to boost production). The promise of mRNA to fix cancer may even include the cancers caused by mRNA. That's marketing synergy on steroids. As you say, no such thing as well-intentioned when it comes to a lot of these programs.
Here's just one of many clips that can be found about what goes on with impunity behind our backs. No one is considering the consequence and potentially disastrous side effects of such things.
https://rumble.com/v6vqgxj-alarming-geoengineering-report-the-elites-climate-engineering-and-weather-m.html?e9s=src_v1_eh_us
I hope you have ideas for antidotes.
I just ordered (Chlor ine Diox ide) kit (put the C and D word together-highly suppressed info) from Amazon. To my knowledge JP has never recommended CD l, so we’ll see what he replies. 😊 this is his space, I respect that.
My chemist spouse says if I want it to just drink the tap water.... lol I'd have to look up the yearly report to see how much is in it though.
Hahaha technically he’s correct. IYKYK. Look into it.
Well, YIKES! What about climate meddlers spraying the tiny “mirrors” into clouds to deflect the sun and thus cool the atmosphere (and stunt growing seasons! What dumb idea will they come up with next?) Could that carry viruses?
Depending on the chemical structure of the particles, some may carry toxins, while others don't. However, most microparticles sprayed into the atmosphere, if carried down to our city's level and beyond, will cause airway irritation, resulting in allergic reactions.
Exceptionally interesting!
Fascinating!
Moriarty, what do you mean by "gene delivery system"? Are you talking about a mechanism to explain shedding reports? Something that can carry mRNA or spikes to other people? Or gene retrotranscription into DNA? Or something else I'm not following? Are you saying that people release fungal spores that can carry other material? If a woman has a yeast infection and gets vaxxxed, might she "shed" fungal spores with spike on them, causing problems for nearby women who might have fungal problems of their own and be more susceptible?
It means that by manipulating and using HMGB1 to cause a sordid post-translation modification (adding things after the protein is produced, in this case, the viral Spike) the virus can use HMGB1 to deliver itself into core parts of the cell machinery and yes, in "insert itself".
Although so far the evidence points towards more transient epigenetic changes, rather than retroviral-style (HIV).
I am saying a virus does what an injection does, thus, we are merely more apt to defend ourselves from it.
No, sorry for the confusion, but even someone infected with Candida Auris wouldn't "shed" spores with Spike. But I 100% believe fungal colonies and otherwise skin conditions caused by yeast are harboring Spike fragments.
On the GDS, ok, I think I get it. Maybe I need to review your best article for discussing HMGB1, if you could provide me a link. That critter just keeps coming up again and again. Otherwise, I may search and see what I can find.
On the yeast question, people do breathe out fungi and other critters every time they breathe. Note the diseases cultured on a surgical mask after a couple hours. If fungi breathed out are capable of harboring spike proteins, why would that not be a possible way to "shed" the spike to others, or then again perhaps to communicate it skin-to-skin or during sex? It just seems to me that you can't say that yeast colonies can harbor spike proteins and not consider the avenues for communicating themselves to others, for those avenues surely exist, do they not? Where am I going wrong here in my thinking?
"...as yeast and fungi are annoyingly persistent."
Fungus, yeast, basically almost all microorganisms are affected (as are we, since we are comprised of them as a halobiome) by low level electromagnetic radiation.😐
Most will proliferate under low EMR as it acts as a hormetic, adaptive function. So teasing apart what is an effect of LL-EMR and what is a direct effect of Spike/LNP will be difficult. There's no data even on poorer outcomes of hospitalused COVID comparing exposure rates to environmental LL-EMR, because it's not convenient to narrative in any way, shape, or form and because most dismiss the concept as conspiracy. Ironic as hospitals antimicrobial resistance issues are legendary in certain circles, and also very high in EMR There's quite a lot of different solutions/therapeutics to the virus/spike, it appears to actually be not particularly dangerous in itself, but when the spike is combined with environmental EMR, we get a very different picture, particularly in susceptible populations.😐
The real danger from spikopathies is in its persistence, which again, I think if tested in an EMR free environment would be very different.
I look forward to reading the continuation of this series.🙏
#follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade
The problem with promoting this information is that it may lead to another round of masking.
Even a black satanic cloth mask might filter some spores and fungi.