8 Comments
User's avatar
Geoffrey Newton's avatar

Thank you for your dedication and research. We must know what we are not being told, in order to make informed choices.

Expand full comment
Dennise Reed's avatar

Very interesting work here. I am a member of Tucker Carlson he just did an interview with Jenner Furst here is the link. Hopefully you can watch it.

After seeing this, they have been damming us for decades.

Dr Fauchi is EVIL.

https://youtu.be/cCn0OYE1Z8E?feature=shared

Expand full comment
sadie's avatar

Infuriating.... but what can be done to stop it? It's like living in a movie only we've had no choice in the script. Any Russian research on this?

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

The best approach is deeply understanding the long term consequences and do our best to mitigate the damage, especially early inflammation, and help the body recover as quickly as possible.

I wouldn't know about Russian research they often gatekeep by only publishing in Russian (the Chinese always publish in English)

Expand full comment
SteveBC's avatar

Nice to have confirmation of reality and someone's evil intent.

Hey, Moriarty, early on there was talk that the spike protein had many different ways to harm you (such as you are mentioning here). One was that folks found I think 3 sequences of snake venom that could create problems. I'm curious as to whether that was simply mistaken or whether it is in fact true, and if true, whether those sequences have any impact.

It would seem to me that with any protein as complex as this engineered spike, that simply random reads of the protein's structure would come across segments that look like almost anything you can think of.

I think what I'm trying to get at here is, well, how do you deconstruct something complex like the spike protein and figure out from all the segments of the protein which segments are real and have real effects, and which are likely to be random read hits that mean nothing, and how does the *shape* of the protein expose the segments that mean something or hide segments that might or might not be meaningful but which are unavailable for exposure and thus noticeable effect?

Also, we know the body's immune system cuts up the spike into random segments and improper mRNA replication creates other random sequences, so perhaps hidden segments that look destructive but have no effect in an intact spike could become active and dangerous once exposed by these two processes?

Expand full comment
Geoffrey Newton's avatar

This is very similar to the Pradhan research paper in 2021?

Expand full comment
Moriarty's avatar

Pradhan compared the sequences and found similarities to HIV, yes.

I personally kept an eye at the sequences and kept researching always paying attention because researchers will publish "novel effects" of the virus, name the sequence but NEVER mention they are GP120/HIV mimics. These are all multifunctional with clinical relevance that is why I pay attention 🧐

Expand full comment
James Jones's avatar

many thanks for this; so many of us are left stumbling and blinking; trying to make sense of what seems so many bewildering things; many sensed RB and others were doing experiments; one got a strong sense MERS was fabricated by man; as was the original conception; but are any of these things more than in silica constructs; some argue that protein folding is so complex; that all these genetic sequences were are quoted; the fabled and mythical furin cleavage; some argue these are just "emperor's clothes": they do not exist as replication-competent; intracellular pathogens; some argue that while some say 1ml of snot has "billions of viral particles": those peering deeply into the snot; cannot identify a single viral particle; us poor creatures; trying to make sense of all of this; just mention our uncertainty; to perhaps provoke more discussion; folks like Geoff Pain seem convinced these things are real; but is this all Darth Vader, or just Geoff Vader, Darth's brother? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv5iEK-IEzw 2min22sec

Expand full comment